flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Metzger (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (FLINK-6374) In yarn cluster model, the -ys parameter is not take effect.
Date Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:42:04 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Robert Metzger updated FLINK-6374:
----------------------------------
    Component/s: YARN

> In yarn cluster model, the -ys parameter is not take effect.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6374
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: YARN
>            Reporter: zhangrucong1982
>
> I use the flink version of 1.2.0. I deploy the Flink cluster on the yarn. I have three
nodes. Every node has 32GB memory and 16 slots. And the flink
> key configuration is :yarn.containers.vcores: 16.
> I use two yarn deployment models, but the result is not same.The details are the following:
> 1、First  I use the flink yarn session model:
> 1) I start the flink yarn cluster with the command:./yarn-session.sh -n 2 -s 1 -d . 
> 2)Then I submit a streaming job with the command :  ./flink run -p 3 ../examples/streaming/WindowJoin.jar
;
> 3) the streaming job deploy failure. The reason is:"Not enough free slots available to
run the job. You can decrease the operator parallelism or increase the number of slots per
TaskManager in the configuration."
> 2、The I use the yarn cluster model:
> 1) I start the yarn cluster and submit a streaming job with command " ./flink run -m
yarn-cluster -yn 2 -ys 1 -p 3 ../examples/streaming/WindowJoin.jar "
> but, the streaming job is runing;
> 2) I look at the code, if there is a -p parameter in the command, the -ys parameter is
not take effect.
> what is the design for -ys parameter?  I think the result of yarn session is reasonable,
the yarn cluster is not reasonable. How do you think?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message