flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-6334) Refactoring UDTF interface
Date Fri, 28 Apr 2017 06:27:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988284#comment-15988284
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6334:
---------------------------------------

Github user sunjincheng121 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3791
  
    HI @Xpray Thanks for the update. I think the PR is in a pretty good shape for me. Except
for the name of `TableFunctionConversions`.  looking forward to @fhueske 's opinion.
    
    Best,
    SunJincheng


> Refactoring UDTF interface
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6334
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6334
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: Ruidong Li
>            Assignee: Ruidong Li
>
> The current UDTF leverages the table.join(expression) interface, which is not a proper
interface in terms of semantics. We would like to refactor this to let UDTF use table.join(table)
interface. Very briefly,  UDTF's apply method will return a Table Type, so Join(UDTF('a, 'b,
...) as 'c) shall be viewed as join(Table)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message