Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E0C200C30 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:18:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 647D9160B68; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AF97A160B5F for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:18:44 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 32309 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2017 15:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 32300 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2017 15:18:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:18:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 597DEC14D1 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:18:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.451 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.451 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hMMLiH_mMcbR for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6622F5F479 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B63BDE08C3 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 270C624172 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:18:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "sunjincheng (JIRA)" To: issues@flink.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-5804) Add [non-partitioned] processing time OVER RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING aggregation to SQL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:18:45 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5804?page=3Dcom.atlassian= .jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1589= 9582#comment-15899582 ]=20 sunjincheng commented on FLINK-5804: ------------------------------------ [~fhueske] Yes, I just thought wrong, ProcessFunction enough.=20 Tomorrow I will open this PR=EF=BC=81 Best=EF=BC=8C SunJincheng > Add [non-partitioned] processing time OVER RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECED= ING aggregation to SQL > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------- > > Key: FLINK-5804 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5804 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Table API & SQL > Reporter: sunjincheng > Assignee: sunjincheng > > The goal of this issue is to add support for OVER RANGE aggregations on p= rocessing time streams to the SQL interface. > Queries similar to the following should be supported: > {code} > SELECT=20 > a,=20 > SUM(b) OVER (ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND = CURRENT ROW) AS sumB, > MIN(b) OVER (ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND = CURRENT ROW) AS minB > FROM myStream > {code} > The following restrictions should initially apply: > - All OVER clauses in the same SELECT clause must be exactly the same. > - Since no PARTITION BY clause is specified, the execution will be single= threaded. > - The ORDER BY clause may only have procTime() as parameter. procTime() i= s a parameterless scalar function that just indicates processing time mode. > - bounded PRECEDING is not supported (see FLINK-5654) > - FOLLOWING is not supported. > The restrictions will be resolved in follow up issues. If we find that so= me of the restrictions are trivial to address, we can add the functionality= in this issue as well. > This issue includes: > - Design of the DataStream operator to compute OVER ROW aggregates > - Translation from Calcite's RelNode representation (LogicalProject with = RexOver expression). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)