Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:14:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@flink.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12782836.1426681151000.12351.1488982478102@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12782836.1426681151000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12782836.1426681151000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.12782836.1426681151566@jira-lw-us.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-1725) New Partitioner for better load
 balancing for skewed data
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 14:14:43 -0000


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901312#comment-15901312 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1725:
---------------------------------------

Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1069
  
    Can we close this pull request and revisit the feature later?
    The partial grouping does currently not work for windows, rescaling, etc, and it would be quite involved to add this.


> New Partitioner for better load balancing for skewed data
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1725
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1725
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DataStream API
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.1
>            Reporter: Anis Nasir
>            Assignee: Anis Nasir
>              Labels: LoadBalancing, Partitioner
>   Original Estimate: 336h
>  Remaining Estimate: 336h
>
> Hi,
> We have recently studied the problem of load balancing in Storm [1].
> In particular, we focused on key distribution of the stream for skewed data.
> We developed a new stream partitioning scheme (which we call Partial Key Grouping). It achieves better load balancing than key grouping while being more scalable than shuffle grouping in terms of memory.
> In the paper we show a number of mining algorithms that are easy to implement with partial key grouping, and whose performance can benefit from it. We think that it might also be useful for a larger class of algorithms.
> Partial key grouping is very easy to implement: it requires just a few lines of code in Java when implemented as a custom grouping in Storm [2].
> For all these reasons, we believe it will be a nice addition to the standard Partitioners available in Flink. If the community thinks it's a good idea, we will be happy to offer support in the porting.
> References:
> [1]. https://melmeric.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/the-power-of-both-choices-practical-load-balancing-for-distributed-stream-processing-engines.pdf
> [2]. https://github.com/gdfm/partial-key-grouping


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)