Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 03:17:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Jark Wu (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@flink.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.13038120.1485438564000.25925.1487733464098@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.13038120.1485438564000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.13038120.1485438564000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.13038120.1485438564268@jira-lw-us.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-5656) Add processing time OVER ROWS
 BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING aggregation to SQL
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 03:17:49 -0000


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15877380#comment-15877380 ] 

Jark Wu commented on FLINK-5656:
--------------------------------

[~sunjingcheng] I'm fine with this as I haven't start this issue. If you think you can implement them together, then feel free to go ahead!

> Add processing time OVER ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING aggregation to SQL
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5656
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: Jark Wu
>
> The goal of this issue is to add support for OVER ROW aggregations on processing time streams to the SQL interface.
> Queries similar to the following should be supported:
> {code}
> SELECT 
>   a, 
>   SUM(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() ROW BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS sumB,
>   MIN(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() ROW BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS minB
> FROM myStream
> {code}
> The following restrictions should initially apply:
> - All OVER clauses in the same SELECT clause must be exactly the same.
> - The PARTITION BY clause is optional (no partitioning results in single threaded execution).
> - The ORDER BY clause may only have procTime() as parameter. procTime() is a parameterless scalar function that just indicates processing time mode.
> - x PRECEDING is not supported (see FLINK-5653)
> - FOLLOWING is not supported.
> The restrictions will be resolved in follow up issues. If we find that some of the restrictions are trivial to address, we can add the functionality in this issue as well.
> This issue includes:
> - Design of the DataStream operator to compute OVER ROW aggregates
> - Translation from Calcite's RelNode representation (LogicalProject with RexOver expression).


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)