flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-4379) Add Rescalable Non-Partitioned State
Date Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:04:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15516017#comment-15516017
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4379:
---------------------------------------

Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2512
  
    +1, I like the changes.
    
    Concerning (7) - I think creating the state backend once sounds good. It is more in line
with the keyed state backend.
    
    Concerning Aljoscha's comments: Removing SnapshotProvider makes sense, if it is only an
internal interface and never exposed to the user.
    
    Conderning the name `OperatorState` - I actually like the name. It is state that exists
in the instance of an operator, assuming that functions are also (special cases of) operators.
    I would add to this pull request that it removes the deprecated `OperatorState` interface
(superclass of `ValueState`).


> Add Rescalable Non-Partitioned State
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4379
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4379
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>            Reporter: Ufuk Celebi
>            Assignee: Stefan Richter
>
> This issue is associated with [FLIP-8| https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-8%3A+Rescalable+Non-Partitioned+State].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message