Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3145D200B5C for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:28:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 2FC03160A93; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 792A3160A90 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:28:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 44216 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2016 17:28:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 44207 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2016 17:28:48 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:28:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 561111876C5 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:28:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.446 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.446 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DplKqWVvT2ZS for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 3A7245F610 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44184 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2016 17:28:44 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:28:44 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id E4732E0019; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:28:43 +0000 (UTC) From: StephanEwen To: issues@flink.incubator.apache.org Reply-To: issues@flink.incubator.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] flink issue #2358: [FLINK-4382] Buffer rpc calls until the RpcEndpoint has b... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20160811172843.E4732E0019@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:28:43 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:28:50 -0000 Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2358 Not completely sure about the message stashing. Why not drop the messages? That would be safer (less to clean up, no overflow). Is this mainly to not loose the messages from the "self gateway"? Because for all remote messages, it should be not necessary, it should simply appear as if the actor/endpoint started a few milliseconds later. It may in the common case not be much of an issue, as the period during which messages are stashed is small, but I think it is simply not necessary. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---