flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-4431) Introduce a "VisibleForTesting" annotation
Date Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:30:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15428109#comment-15428109

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4431:

Github user ramkrish86 commented on the issue:

    +1. Very useful one. Also I saw some of the interfaces though they are supposed to be
Public it is not marked with those types. Is it better to fix all of them ? Or add a test
case that ensures that any new class/existing class if it misses annotation either Public
or Private or what ever could be a new type, then we should fail the build. We have such a
procedure in our project. Sorry if this is offtopic. Just thought of it so saying here.

> Introduce a "VisibleForTesting" annotation
> ------------------------------------------
>                 Key: FLINK-4431
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4431
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Stephan Ewen
>            Assignee: Stephan Ewen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.2.0
> I suggest to introduce a {{VisibleForTesting}} annotation in the {{flink-annotations}}
> Adding this annotation to methods that are really only in place for testing is very useful
feature. Currently, we depend on Guava for that. Having a guava dependency for a documentation
annotation class seems a bit much.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message