flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mjsax <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-2837][storm] various improvements for S...
Date Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:53:36 GMT
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:

    --- Diff: flink-contrib/flink-storm-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/storm/util/BoltFileSink.java
    @@ -18,20 +18,23 @@
     package org.apache.flink.storm.util;
     import backtype.storm.task.TopologyContext;
    +import org.apache.flink.core.fs.FSDataOutputStream;
    +import org.apache.flink.core.fs.FileSystem;
    +import org.apache.flink.core.fs.Path;
     import java.io.BufferedWriter;
    -import java.io.FileWriter;
     import java.io.IOException;
    +import java.io.OutputStreamWriter;
     import java.util.Map;
    - * Implements a sink that write the received data to the given file (as a result of {@code
Object.toString()} for each
    + * Implements a sink that writes the received data to the given file (as a result of
{@code Object.toString()} for each
      * attribute).
     public final class BoltFileSink extends AbstractBoltSink {
     	private static final long serialVersionUID = 2014027288631273666L;
    -	private final String path;
    +	private final Path path;
     	private BufferedWriter writer;
    --- End diff --
    That's not the point. If I re-use an existing bolt, I don't want to change anything. And
I want to be able (from an example point of view) to run this bolt as-is in Storm, too. (Without
any dependencies to Flink)

If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.

View raw message