flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chesnay Schepler (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2692) Untangle CsvInputFormat into PojoTypeCsvInputFormat and TupleTypeCsvInputFormat
Date Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:41:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14961858#comment-14961858
] 

Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-2692:
-----------------------------------------

ah my bad, its available through the Scala API's ExecutionEnvironment, so it's staying then...

> Untangle CsvInputFormat into PojoTypeCsvInputFormat and TupleTypeCsvInputFormat 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2692
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2692
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Till Rohrmann
>            Assignee: Chesnay Schepler
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The {{CsvInputFormat}} currently allows to return values as a {{Tuple}} or a {{Pojo}}
type. As a consequence, the processing logic, which has to work for both types, is overly
complex. For example, the {{CsvInputFormat}} contains fields which are only used when a Pojo
is returned. Moreover, the pojo field information are constructed by calling setter methods
which have to be called in a very specific order, otherwise they fail. E.g. one first has
to call {{setFieldTypes}} before calling {{setOrderOfPOJOFields}}, otherwise the number of
fields might be different. Furthermore, some of the methods can only be called if the return
type is a {{Pojo}} type, because they expect that a {{PojoTypeInfo}} is present.
> I think the {{CsvInputFormat}} should be refactored to make the code more easily maintainable.
I propose to split it up into a {{PojoTypeCsvInputFormat}} and a {{TupleTypeCsvInputFormat}}
which take all the required information via their constructors instead of using the {{setFields}}
and {{setOrderOfPOJOFields}} approach.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message