flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christophe Jolif <cjo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.5.0
Date Mon, 05 Feb 2018 14:59:09 GMT
Hi guys,

Sorry for jumping in, but I think

[FLINK-8101] Elasticsearch 6.X support
[FLINK-7386]  Flink Elasticsearch 5 connector is not compatible with
Elasticsearch 5.2+ client

 have long been awaited and there was one PR from me and from someone else
showing the interest ;) So if you could consider it for 1.5 that would be
great!

Thanks!
--
Christophe

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Timo Walther <twalthr@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Aljoscha,
>
> it would be great if we can include the first version of the SQL client
> (see FLIP-24, Implementation Plan 1). I will open a PR this week. I think
> we can merge this with explicit "experimental/alpha" status. It is far away
> from feature completeness but will be a great tool for Flink beginners.
>
> In order to use the SQL client we would need to also add some table
> sources with the new unified table factories (FLINK-8535), but this is
> optional because a user can implement own table factories at the begining.
>
> Regards,
> Timo
>
>
> Am 2/5/18 um 2:36 PM schrieb Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai:
>
> Hi Aljoscha,
>>
>> Thanks for starting the discussion.
>>
>> I think there’s a few connector related must-have improvements that we
>> should get in before the feature freeze, since quite a few users have been
>> asking for them:
>>
>> [FLINK-6352] FlinkKafkaConsumer should support to use timestamp to set up
>> start offset
>> [FLINK-5479] Per-partition watermarks in FlinkKafkaConsumer should
>> consider idle partitions
>> [FLINK-8516] Pluggable shard-to-subtask partitioning for
>> FlinkKinesisConsumer
>> [FLINK-6109] Add a “checkpointed offset” metric to FlinkKafkaConsumer
>>
>> These are still missing in the master branch. Only FLINK-5479 is still
>> lacking a pull request.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gordon
>>
>> On 31 January 2018 at 10:38:43 AM, Aljoscha Krettek (aljoscha@apache.org)
>> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> When we decided to do the 1.4.0 release a while back we did that to get a
>> stable release out before putting in a couple of new features. Back then,
>> some of those new features (FLIP-6, network stack changes, local state
>> recovery) were almost ready and we wanted to do a shortened 1.5.0
>> development cycle to allow for those features to become ready and then do
>> the next release.
>>
>> We are now approaching the approximate time where we wanted to do the
>> Flink 1.5.0 release so I would like to gauge where we are and gather
>> opinions on how we should proceed now.
>>
>> With this, I'd also like to propose myself as the release manager for
>> 1.5.0 but I'm very happy to yield if someone else would be interested in
>> doing that.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Best,
>> Aljoscha
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Christophe

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message