Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC364200C6E for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:39:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DADB2160BA5; Mon, 8 May 2017 08:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D277160B99 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:39:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 28392 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2017 08:39:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 28381 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2017 08:39:43 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 May 2017 08:39:43 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id A19891A002E for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 08:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b84so46038759wmh.0 for ; Mon, 08 May 2017 01:39:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBIU3uDJQJZGxyNe9TzerPh2/awdX3Gn6L6Lo6+65S4QLahdTf+ xpyFwFxBG5pQL7ttzMisSrA5wUKwkw== X-Received: by 10.25.193.1 with SMTP id r1mr7228843lff.127.1494232781036; Mon, 08 May 2017 01:39:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.46.0.193 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2017 01:39:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6254dee3-8321-4f6b-a029-bb5bbdcf6d2b.wangzhijiang999@aliyun.com> <37E2F15C-C0A2-480F-A345-A1E874224300@apache.org> <9dff3e03-0045-bde4-eaed-db56dd03ffa1@apache.org> <4354E798-4584-4321-A690-0F70D74C2407@data-artisans.com> <8B754047F81D6B4290B9F4CE928333A517C4E879@lhreml503-mbx> From: Robert Metzger Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 10:39:20 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Feature Freeze To: "dev@flink.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c19d222202840054eff2e13 archived-at: Mon, 08 May 2017 08:39:45 -0000 --94eb2c19d222202840054eff2e13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It depends :) If the unstable tests are caused by a bug in the tests itself, its not an issue. If its a blocking issue in one of the core components, I'll immediately create a new RC. Part of the reason why I'm creating the RC0 is also to ensure that the build infrastructure properly works. On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Kostas Kloudas wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Thanks for starting the process! > > My only remark is that given that the master is unstable, does it make > sense to create an RC0? > > Kostas > > > On May 8, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > > > > Great! > > It also looks like the other big features made it also into master this > > weekend. > > > > I'll now create the feature branch and create the testing RC0. > > > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Fabian Hueske > wrote: > > > >> I merged the last to major features for the Table API / SQL (time > >> indicators and retraction support) to master. > >> We will need to work on some smaller issues for those features which > will > >> take a few more days (1 week max), but the big changes are in. > >> > >> Working on those final issue does not block a release candidate. The > Table > >> API / SQL are on top of the DataStream API and runtime. > >> So the last fixes won't interfere with testing the lower levels of the > >> system. > >> > >> Cheers, Fabian > >> > >> 2017-05-05 21:02 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen : > >> > >>> Yes, I second Ufuk, thanks Robert and Aljoscha for the effort. > >>> > >>> Thanks to the community for hard work on the features. > >>> > >>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Stephan Ewen > wrote: > >>>>> Also, if no release candidate would be created today, it would not > >> make > >>>> any > >>>>> difference anyways... > >>>> > >>>> If no one tests a RC (if created today) over the weekend it also > >>>> wouldn't make a difference. ;-) > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to all for chiming in here and Robert and Aljoscha especially > >>>> for making sure that everyone is on the same page wrt blockers etc. > >>>> > >>> > >> > > --94eb2c19d222202840054eff2e13--