flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.3.0 (RC2)
Date Fri, 26 May 2017 13:59:55 GMT
Thanks a lot.

JIRA also shows me 0 open blockers :)
I'll then kick off the RC3 creation process.

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzulitai@apache.org>
wrote:

> The two blockers FLINK-6646 and FLINK-6714 have been merged.
>
>
> On 26 May 2017 at 1:45:55 AM, Robert Metzger (rmetzger@apache.org) wrote:
>
> Okay, it seems like there are two blockers for this RC.
> Once both PRs are merged, I'll create the next RC (ideally tomorrow)
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzulitai@apache.org
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6714 is most likely
> a
> > blocker.
> > It basically makes most of our connectors that are not part of the binary
> > distribution and uses Java serialization for their operator state
> unusable
> > in standalone mode.
> >
> > There's a pending PR for the fix: https://github.com/
> > apache/flink/pull/3987.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gordon
> > On 25 May 2017 at 12:45:12 AM, Till Rohrmann (trohrmann@apache.org)
> wrote:
> >
> > Forwarding my concern from the previous RC thread:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6646 might be a blocker,
> > because it voids Flink's HA capabilities.
> >
> > Robert argued that this is not a blocker because it was already broken in
> > 1.2 and users didn't complain about it. Therefore, it seems to affect
> only
> > corner cases.
> >
> > I think that partial high-availability is as good as no high-availability
> > at all. Therefore, I think we should cancel this RC and create a new one
> > containing a fix for the problem. Moreover, this is not only a problem of
> > the session mode but also for the per job cluster mode. Users simply
> didn't
> > run into the problem, because apparently their JM recovery didn't take
> > longer than 60s.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > this is the first VOTEing release candidate for Flink 1.3.0
> > >
> > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > e0a886e9 <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9
> >
> > > (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9
> > > <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>*)
> > >
> > > Branch:
> > > release-1.3.0-rc2
> > >
> > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/
> > > <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/>*
> > >
> > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> D9839159:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >
> > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheflink-1121
> > > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheflink-1121
> > >*
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote ends on Monday (May 29th), 7pm CET.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.3.0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ...
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message