flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Feature Freeze
Date Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:03:11 GMT
Hi Flavio,

I have also fix the issue in 1.2 branch, but the next release will be 1.2.2

Best,
Kurt

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:

> Flavio:
> Have you seen this (w.r.t. 1.2.1) ?
>
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/Flink/VkLeQejxLg24Lk0D1?subj=+
> RESULT+VOTE+Release+Apache+Flink+1+2+1+RC2+
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <pompermaier@okkam.it>
> wrote:
>
> > Any chance to cherry-pick this also into 1.2.1? We're usign Flink 1.2.0
> in
> > production and maybe an upgrade to 1.2.1 would be a safer option in the
> > short term..
> >
> > Best,
> > Flavio
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ah, I see. The fix for that has been merged into master so it will be
> > > release in Flink 1.3.
> > >
> > > > On 28. Apr 2017, at 13:50, Flavio Pompermaier <pompermaier@okkam.it>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, you're right Aljosha..the issue number is correct, the link is
> > > > wrong! The correct one is https://issues.apache.org/
> > > jira/browse/FLINK-6398
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> > aljoscha@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I think there might be a typo. We haven’t yet reached issue number
> > 6389,
> > > >> if I’m not mistaken. The latest as I’m writing this is 6410.
> > > >>
> > > >>> On 28. Apr 2017, at 10:00, Flavio Pompermaier <
> pompermaier@okkam.it>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> If it's not a problem it will be great for us to include also
> > > FLINK-6398
> > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6938> if it's
not a
> big
> > > >> deal
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Flavio
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Zhuoluo Yang <
> > > >> zhuoluo.yzl@alibaba-inc.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi Devs,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks for the release plan.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Could you also please add the feature FLINK-6196
> > > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6196> Support
> dynamic
> > > >> schema
> > > >>>> in Table Function?
> > > >>>> I’d like to update the code as comments left on PR today.
> > > >>>> I will try to make sure the code is updated before the Apr
30th.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Zhuoluo 😀
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 在 2017年4月28日,上午8:48,Haohui Mai <ricetons@gmail.com>
写道:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks for starting this thread. It would be great to see
the
> > > following
> > > >>>> features available in Flink 1.3:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> * Support for complex schema: FLINK-6033, FLINK-6377
> > > >>>> * Various improvements on SQL over group windows: FLINK-6335,
> > > FLINK-6373
> > > >>>> * StreamTableSink for JDBC and Cassandra: FLINK-6281, FLINK-6225
> > > >>>> * Decoupling Flink and Hadoop: FLINK-5998
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> All of them have gone through at least one round of review
so I'm
> > > >>>> optimistic that they can make it to 1.3 in a day or two.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Additionally it would be great to see FLINK-6232 go in, but
it
> > depends
> > > >> on
> > > >>>> FLINK-5884 so it might be a little bit tough.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards,
> > > >>>> Haohui
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:22 PM Chesnay Schepler <
> > chesnay@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> FLINK-5892 (Restoring state by operator) is also nearing
> completion,
> > > but
> > > >>>> with only 1 day left before the weekend we're cutting it really
> > short.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Since this eliminates a major pain point when updating jobs,
as it
> > > >>>> allows the modification of chains, another day or 2 would
be good
> i
> > > >> think.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards,
> > > >>>> Chesnay
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 27.04.2017 18:55, Bowen Li wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hi Ufuk,
> > > >>>>    I'd like to get FLINK-6013 (Adding Datadog Http metrics
> reporter)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> into
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> release 1.3. It's in the final state of code review in
> > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3736
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>> Bowen
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999)
<
> > > >>>> wangzhijiang999@aliyun.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hi Ufuk,
> > > >>>> Thank you for launching this topic!
> > > >>>> I wish my latest refinement of buffer provider (
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> jira/browse/FLINK-6337)  to be included in 1.3 and most of
the
> jobs
> > > can
> > > >>>> get benefit from it. And I think it can be completed with
the help
> > of
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> your
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> reviews this week.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Cheers,Zhijiang---------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> ---------------------发件人:Ufuk
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Celebi <uce@apache.org>发送时间:2017年4月27日(星期四)
22:25收件人:dev <
> > > >>>> dev@flink.apache.org>抄 送:Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>主
> > > >>>> 题:[DISCUSS] Feature Freeze
> > > >>>> Hey devs! :-)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> We decided to follow a time-based release model with the upcoming
> > 1.3
> > > >>>> release and the planned feature freeze is on Monday, May 1st.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I wanted to start a discussion to get a quick overview of
the
> > current
> > > >>>> state of things.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> - Is everyone on track and aware of the feature freeze? ;)
> > > >>>> - Are there any major features we want in 1.3 that
> > > >>>> have not been merged yet?
> > > >>>> - Do we need to extend the feature freeze, because of an
> > > >>>> important feature?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Would be great to gather a list of features/PRs that we want
in
> the
> > > >>>> 1.3 release. This could be a good starting point for the release
> > > >>>> manager (@Robert?).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Ufuk
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message