Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C56D200C46 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:35:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8ACEB160B8A; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D2004160B7C for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:35:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 99346 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2017 15:35:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 99335 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2017 15:35:34 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:35:34 +0000 Received: from Timos-MacBook-Pro.fritz.box (ipservice-092-219-046-010.092.219.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.219.46.10]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id C271E1A04D1 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.1 (RC1) To: dev@flink.apache.org References: <16ABE58F-592A-4D9B-A00C-1287619C0C0B@apache.org> <58D8E26F.30900@apache.org> From: Timo Walther Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:35:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit archived-at: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:35:41 -0000 A user reported that all tumbling and slinding window assigners contain a pretty obvious bug about offsets. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6214 I think we should also fix this for 1.2.1. What do you think? Regards, Timo Am 29/03/17 um 11:30 schrieb Robert Metzger: > Hi Haohui, > I agree that we should fix the parallelism issue. Otherwise, the 1.2.1 > release would introduce a new bug. > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Haohui Mai wrote: > >> -1 (non-binding) >> >> We recently found out that all jobs submitted via UI will have a >> parallelism of 1, potentially due to FLINK-5808. >> >> Filed FLINK-6209 to track it. >> >> ~Haohui >> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:59 AM Chesnay Schepler >> wrote: >> >>> If possible I would like to include FLINK-6183 & FLINK-6184 as well. >>> >>> They fix 2 metric-related issues that could arise when a Task is >>> cancelled very early. (like, right away) >>> >>> FLINK-6183 fixes a memory leak where the TaskMetricGroup was never closed >>> FLINK-6184 fixes a NullPointerExceptions in the buffer metrics >>> >>> PR here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3611 >>> >>> On 26.03.2017 12:35, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: >>>> I opened a PR for FLINK-6188: https://github.com/apache/ >> flink/pull/3616 >>> >>>> This improves the previously very sparse test coverage for >>> timestamp/watermark assigners and fixes the bug. >>>>> On 25 Mar 2017, at 10:22, Ufuk Celebi wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I agree with Aljoscha. >>>>> >>>>> -1 because of FLINK-6188 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < >> aljoscha@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>> I filed this issue, which was observed by a user: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188 >>>>>> I think that’s blocking for 1.2.1. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 24 Mar 2017, at 18:57, Ufuk Celebi wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RC1 doesn't contain Stefan's backport for the Asynchronous snapshots >>>>>>> for heap-based keyed state that has been merged. Should we create >> RC2 >>>>>>> with that fix since the voting period only starts on Monday? I think >>>>>>> it would only mean rerunning the scripts on your side, right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> – Ufuk >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Robert Metzger < >> rmetzger@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Dear Flink community, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink >>> version 1.2 >>>>>>>> .1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on: >>>>>>>> *732e55bd* (* >>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/732e55bd >>>>>>>> *) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Branch: >>>>>>>> release-1.2.1-rc1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >>>>>>>> *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/ >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint >>> D9839159: >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>>>>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1116 >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The vote ends on Wednesday, March 29, 2017, 3pm CET. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.2.1 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... >>>