flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Official policy for release maintenance
Date Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:04:59 GMT
Awesome great to see this explicit.
Thanks.

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:

> I've decided to put it on the download page. Please check out my PR:
> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/50
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Robert, I would like that!
> >
> > +1 for adding something to the Downloads page. Maybe add it to the FAQ
> > and link from the downloads page or the other way around? I don't know
> > what's better.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > I'll update the Wikipedia article and include the details into our
> wiki.
> > >
> > > In addition, what do you think about adding the "update guarantees" on
> > the
> > > download or FAQ page?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey Ismael,
> > >>
> > >> thanks for bringing this up. I think it's a very important to
> > >> communicate this on the project web page.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Ismaël Mejía <iemejia@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> > What do you think guys? Has this been discussed before? Maybe this
> is
> > a
> > >> > good moment to decide this, if we haven’t.
> > >>
> > >> There was a discussion [1] about adopting time based releases were
> > >> most committers and contributors agreed to support the last two major
> > >> versions, e.g. the latest stable and the previous stable (1.2 and 1.1
> > >> for our current release).
> > >>
> > >> It would be nice to formulate this officially somewhere with more
> > >> details, e.g. previous major release gets critical bug fixes only. The
> > >> time based releases Wiki page [2] does not do this currently.
> > >>
> > >> Is that in line with the Wikipedia article? It could be that the
> > >> wording was/is confusing.
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.
> > >> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Time-based-releases-in-Flink-td15386.html
> > >>
> > >> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Time-
> > based+releases
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message