flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexey Demin <diomi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] (Not) tagging reviewers
Date Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:05:14 GMT
Hi all

View from my prospective:
in middle of summer - 150 PR
in middle of autumn - 180
now 206.

This is mix of bugfixes and improvements.
I understand that work on new features important, but when small and
trivial fixes stay in states of PR more then 2-3 month,
then all users think about changing engine on other product.

Only way push people to merge this fixes in master it's tags.

I don't speak about big changes, only about small and trivial with review
less then 5 min.

Features important, but if this features work incorrect, then user can
select more stability product without any hesitation.

Alexey Diomin

2017-01-16 16:36 GMT+04:00 Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org>:

> On 16 January 2017 at 12:59:04, Paris Carbone (parisc@kth.se) wrote:
> > > Though, when someone has started reviewing a PR and shows interest
> > it probably makes sense to finish doing so. Wouldn’t tagging
> > be acceptable there?
> > In those case tagging triggers direct notifications, so that
> > people already involved in a conversation get reminded and answer
> > pending questions.
> I think that's totally fine Paris since it is more of a reminder in that
> case.
> Stephan is referring to PRs that have a last line in the description like
> "@XZY for review please".
> – Ufuk

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message