Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AMSPR03MB06449DED1BAECE38588C60B78AB10@AMSPR03MB0644.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AMSPR03MB06449DED1BAECE38588C60B78AB10@AMSPR03MB0644.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:22:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAC27z=N91P2SNxw0DUnLDBx1k40oJLMDyrdUiQxC86VCSVdF8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Add Sonarqube analysis
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Cc: Anton Mushin <Anton_Mushin@epam.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113edd92a514c705417bbbdc
archived-at: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:22:51 -0000

--001a113edd92a514c705417bbbdc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Boris,

I think it is a good idea to gather some more metrics about Flink's code
quality. This can help to address deficiencies and finally improve Flink's
code and test coverage. So +1 for adding it if it does not conflict with
any Apache regulations. But given anlaysis.apache.org it seems to be fine.

Cheers,
Till

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Boris Osipov <Boris_Osipov@epam.com>
wrote:

> Hi community,
>
> What do you think about adding Flink code to analysis via Sonarqube
> http://www.sonarqube.org/ tool?
> I've ran analysis on my machine and I'd like to share short report here
> https://goo.gl/GdfoLm
> As you can see, there are some problems with code quality detected by tool.
>
> I found that Apache Software Foundation has the Sonarqube code analytics
> service https://analysis.apache.org/.
> In addition, Travice CI has integration with Sonarqube.com. It is free for
> open source projects.
> We can use one of them for analysis.
>
> Please, share your thoughts.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris Osipov
>
>

--001a113edd92a514c705417bbbdc--