flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Schedule and Scope for Flink 1.2
Date Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:09:01 GMT
+1 for the features to include.

What is the state of the Trigger DSL? How much is left to be done before
merging?

Cheers,
Till

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1 the schedule proposed so far.
>
> Do we also want to get in the "Trigger DSL" that we've had brewing for a
> while now?
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 at 16:17 Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I think this sounds very reasonable, +1 to the schedule.
> >
> > I would definitely add
> >   - FLIP-10 (unify checkpoints and savepoints)
> >   - FLIP-7 (metrics in web UI)
> >   - FLIP-12 (async request operators)
> >
> > Those should be all safe bets, as they are basically done.
> >
> > Let's see what else is in shape until the feature freeze day.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > Flink 1.1.0 was released in August and I think it is time to kick off a
> > > discussion about the schedule and scope of Flink 1.2.0.
> > >
> > > == Scope
> > >
> > > We started to collect features for Flink 1.2.0 in the Flink Release
> wiki
> > > page [1].
> > > I copy the feature list for convenience:
> > >
> > >    - Dynamic Scaling / Key Groups (FLINK-3755
> > >    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3755>) (Design Doc
> > >    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G1OS1z3xEBOrYD4wSu-
> > > LuBCyPUWyFd9l3T9WyssQ63w/edit#heading=h.2suhu1fjxmp4>
> > >    )
> > >    - Rescalable Non-Partitioned State (FLIP-8
> > >    <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-
> > > 8%3A+Rescalable+Non-Partitioned+State>
> > >    )
> > >    - Backwards compatible savepoints (FLINK-4797
> > >    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4797>)
> > >    -
> > >
> > >    Integrate Flink with Apache Mesos (FLINK-1984
> > >    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984>) (Design Doc
> > >    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WItafBmGbjlaBbP8Of5PAFOH9GUJQ
> > > xf5S4hjEuPchuU/edit#heading=h.33uxp8abvuf0>
> > >    )
> > >    - Secure Data Access (FLINK-3930
> > >    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3930>) (Design Doc
> > >    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-
> GQB6uVOyoaXGwtqwqLV8BHDxWiMO2W
> > > nVzBoJ8oPaAs/edit#heading=h.dr22iualfm0h>
> > >    )
> > >    - Queryable State (FLINK-3779
> > >    <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3779>)
> > >    - Metrics in Webinterface (FLIP-7
> > >    <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-
> > > 7%3A+Expose+metrics+to+WebInterface>
> > >    )
> > >    - Kafka 0.10 support (FLINK-4035
> > >    <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4035>)
> > >    - Table API: Group Window Aggregates (FLINK-4691, FLIP-11)
> > >    - Table API: Scalar Functions (FLINK-3097)
> > >
> > >
> > > Is a feature missing or something too ambitious?
> > >
> > > == Schedule
> > >
> > > In my opinion we should try to release 1.2.0 before Christmas. That
> > means,
> > > we should have a RC1 by end November / early December and a feature
> > freeze
> > > two weeks earlier in mid of November. Does that sound appropriate or
> > should
> > > we aim for an earlier or later release?
> > >
> > > What do others think about the scope and schedule?
> > > Please discuss.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Fabian
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/
> > > Flink+Release+and+Feature+Plan
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message