flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2
Date Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:13:08 GMT
+1 for 1.1.2

Looks like everything is in the release-1.1 branch already except the
Kinesis and Quickstart fix.
For the Kinesis issue Tzu-Liu Tai seems onto it already.
The quickstart is trivial fix.

Let's aim for patch-freeze next week Monday evening?


On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for a 1.1.2 release.
>
> I'd like to have the Joda time exclusion removed from the Quickstart POM to
> include the dependency in the fat jar.
> Otherwise jobs with that dependency (such as the Flink training examples)
> fail with ClassNotFound.
>
> Robert fix that on the side in https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2153.
> So it would be good to have the PR in 1.1.2 or at least the relevant change
> be separately merged.
>
> Cheers, Fabian
>
> 2016-08-24 12:45 GMT+02:00 Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org>:
>
> > +1 for a 1.1.2 release soon. I think we should have the fixes in by
> > the beginning of next week. Otherwise, further fixes could also make
> > it into 1.1.3.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyfora@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I agree that there has been some critical issues discovered and it
> would
> > be
> > > to get the fixes out as soon as possible :)
> > >
> > > On my side I would like to add the fixes for:
> > > FLINK-4441
> > > FLINK-4471
> > >
> > > Both can be critical for applications that use the RocksDB backend.
> > >
> > > Gyula
> > >
> > > Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2016. aug. 24., Sze,
> > 12:25):
> > >
> > >> It's been ~2 weeks since we released Flink 1.1.1 and I wanted to start
> > >> discussing releasing Flink 1.1.2.
> > >>
> > >> There have been 27 commits in the release-1.1 branch since the
> > >> release, including at least one critical issue:
> > >>
> > >> [FLINK-4332] [checkpoints] Fix SavepointV1Serializer read() /
> > >> readFully() (2 weeks ago) <Stephan Ewen>
> > >>
> > >> This can lead to savepoints being not deserialized correctly. A user
> > >> did already run into this and reported it in FLINK-4425. There are
> > >> also other minor user reported issues (like FLINK-4454) that have been
> > >> fixed.
> > >>
> > >> What do you think about this? We would need a volunteer for release
> > >> manager.
> > >>
> > >> – Ufuk
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message