flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.2
Date Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:23:14 GMT
I'll create a release candidate now.

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
wrote:

> Gordon fixed the Kinesis consumer already over the weekend. I just merged
> the change.
>
> I'll push a hotfix for the jodatime+quickstart issue to both branches.
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzulitai@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Next week Monday evening should be fine to get the Kinesis issue fix in.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for 1.1.2
>> >
>> > Looks like everything is in the release-1.1 branch already except the
>> > Kinesis and Quickstart fix.
>> > For the Kinesis issue Tzu-Liu Tai seems onto it already.
>> > The quickstart is trivial fix.
>> >
>> > Let's aim for patch-freeze next week Monday evening?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 for a 1.1.2 release.
>> > >
>> > > I'd like to have the Joda time exclusion removed from the Quickstart
>> POM
>> > to
>> > > include the dependency in the fat jar.
>> > > Otherwise jobs with that dependency (such as the Flink training
>> examples)
>> > > fail with ClassNotFound.
>> > >
>> > > Robert fix that on the side in https://github.com/apache/flin
>> k/pull/2153
>> > .
>> > > So it would be good to have the PR in 1.1.2 or at least the relevant
>> > change
>> > > be separately merged.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers, Fabian
>> > >
>> > > 2016-08-24 12:45 GMT+02:00 Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org>:
>> > >
>> > > > +1 for a 1.1.2 release soon. I think we should have the fixes in by
>> > > > the beginning of next week. Otherwise, further fixes could also make
>> > > > it into 1.1.3.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyfora@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I agree that there has been some critical issues discovered and
it
>> > > would
>> > > > be
>> > > > > to get the fixes out as soon as possible :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On my side I would like to add the fixes for:
>> > > > > FLINK-4441
>> > > > > FLINK-4471
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Both can be critical for applications that use the RocksDB
>> backend.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Gyula
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2016.
aug. 24.,
>> Sze,
>> > > > 12:25):
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> It's been ~2 weeks since we released Flink 1.1.1 and I wanted
to
>> > start
>> > > > >> discussing releasing Flink 1.1.2.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> There have been 27 commits in the release-1.1 branch since
the
>> > > > >> release, including at least one critical issue:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> [FLINK-4332] [checkpoints] Fix SavepointV1Serializer read()
/
>> > > > >> readFully() (2 weeks ago) <Stephan Ewen>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> This can lead to savepoints being not deserialized correctly.
A
>> user
>> > > > >> did already run into this and reported it in FLINK-4425.
There
>> are
>> > > > >> also other minor user reported issues (like FLINK-4454) that
have
>> > been
>> > > > >> fixed.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> What do you think about this? We would need a volunteer for
>> release
>> > > > >> manager.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> – Ufuk
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message