Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANMXwW2iJoZdHWBvpawKLcbbQmkBzNQ=1RwN_vZvij1w=L1U-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANC1h_usR2_fZ5VpnV1g+VZ9MF0+j4pjbkvPe1pCrjb7oeNDWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <578532EA.2040504@apache.org> <CANC1h_s-ADz5P3PpKrE5_sLRr2rPJNYRyjw5zKcD1UH+xv2OKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGr9p8BiVdhEsyOOkd6XDBhKho+cfPXzOk1JPha7bErXEBf7-g@mail.gmail.com> <CANMXwW2iJoZdHWBvpawKLcbbQmkBzNQ=1RwN_vZvij1w=L1U-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:37:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CANC1h_uA+GwEJoJcAc_hvNURYSSOoQvHbkHPJdJ3W4m8+CsjyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-1 : Fine grained recovery from task failures
To: "dev@flink.apache.org" <dev@flink.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11446af8d53e230537acb934
archived-at: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:38:03 -0000

--001a11446af8d53e230537acb934
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

So far the reactions were positive towards the proposal.
If no one objects, I am going to assume lazy consensus and mark this FLIP
as adopted.

For the process, we'll post future FLIPs in the wiki directly, rather than
in a Google Doc first.

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1
> This was my original motivation. I saw a lot of discussion on the design
> docs I initiated but none of this was reflected on the ML.
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 17:11 Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for writing the proposal!
> >
> > I agree with Chesnay. I thought one of the main motivations of the new
> FLIP
> > process is to move the discussion onto ASF infra, to record the decision
> > making process on the mailing list and to make ongoing activities more
> > visible to the community.
> >
> > If we want to use google docs because of the commenting features, we
> should
> > consider implementing a tool mirroring the comments onto the mailing
> lists.
> >
> > If you want to change the FLIP process, I would suggest to move the
> > discussion about Google Docs to the FLIP 1 thread.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I deliberately kept it initially in the Google Doc because it is easier
> > to
> > > comment.
> > >
> > > I would move it to the wiki once we have passed the initial discussion
> > and
> > > have converged (or are close to convergence) on the design.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > shouldn't the proposal be contained in the wiki instead of
> GoogleDocs?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12.07.2016 19:55, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi all!
> > > >>
> > > >> Here is the very first FLIP (FLink Improvement Proposal): Fine
> grained
> > > >> recovery from task failures
> > > >>
> > > >> It describes a proposed enhancement for reducing the work done
> during
> > > >> recovery.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16S584XFzkfFu3MOfVCE0rHZ_JJgQrQuw9SXpanoMiMo
> > > >>
> > > >> Please comment in this mail thread, or in the GoogleDoc.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Stephan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--001a11446af8d53e230537acb934--