flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-1 : Fine grained recovery from task failures
Date Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:37:47 GMT
I migrated the doc to the wiki

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Paris Carbone <parisc@kth.se> wrote:

> +1
>
> I like the proposal!
>
> Docs can work as supplementary medium to the wiki sometimes, in my view.
> The wiki is definitely much preferred for tracking/archiving purposes but
> it might not hurt if we sometimes also reference a doc with a somewhat
> evolving prototype there.
>
> > On 15 Jul 2016, at 15:37, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > So far the reactions were positive towards the proposal.
> > If no one objects, I am going to assume lazy consensus and mark this FLIP
> > as adopted.
> >
> > For the process, we'll post future FLIPs in the wiki directly, rather
> than
> > in a Google Doc first.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >> This was my original motivation. I saw a lot of discussion on the design
> >> docs I initiated but none of this was reflected on the ML.
> >>
> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 17:11 Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thank you for writing the proposal!
> >>>
> >>> I agree with Chesnay. I thought one of the main motivations of the new
> >> FLIP
> >>> process is to move the discussion onto ASF infra, to record the
> decision
> >>> making process on the mailing list and to make ongoing activities more
> >>> visible to the community.
> >>>
> >>> If we want to use google docs because of the commenting features, we
> >> should
> >>> consider implementing a tool mirroring the comments onto the mailing
> >> lists.
> >>>
> >>> If you want to change the FLIP process, I would suggest to move the
> >>> discussion about Google Docs to the FLIP 1 thread.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I deliberately kept it initially in the Google Doc because it is
> easier
> >>> to
> >>>> comment.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would move it to the wiki once we have passed the initial discussion
> >>> and
> >>>> have converged (or are close to convergence) on the design.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> shouldn't the proposal be contained in the wiki instead of
> >> GoogleDocs?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 12.07.2016 19:55, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi all!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Here is the very first FLIP (FLink Improvement Proposal): Fine
> >> grained
> >>>>>> recovery from task failures
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It describes a proposed enhancement for reducing the work done
> >> during
> >>>>>> recovery.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16S584XFzkfFu3MOfVCE0rHZ_JJgQrQuw9SXpanoMiMo
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please comment in this mail thread, or in the GoogleDoc.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Stephan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message