flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-3 - Organization of Documentation
Date Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:57:08 GMT
I added to the "Application Development" Docs the Section "Types,
TypeInformation, Serialization".
I think that is an important enough aspect to warrant separate docs.

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for the FLIP and making streaming the common case. Very good proposal
> :-)
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 I like it a lot!
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 at 18:43 Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > My take would be to take streaming as the common case and make special
> > > sections for batch.
> > >
> > > We can still have a few streaming-only sections (end to end exactly
> once)
> > > and a few batch-only sections (optimizer).
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I very much like this proposal. This is long overdue. Our
> > > > documentation never "broke up" with the old batch focus. That's where
> > > > the current structure comes from and why people often don't find what
> > > > they are looking for. We were trying to treat streaming and batch as
> > > > equals. We never were "brave" enough to move streaming-only concepts
> > > > to the top-level. I really like that you are proposing this now (for
> > > > example for Event time, State Backends etc.). I would love to have
> > > > this go hand in hand with the 1.2 release.
> > > >
> > > > What is your opinion about pages affecting both streaming and batch
> > > > like "Connectors" or "Failure model"? We could have the landing page
> > > > cover the general material (e.g. restart strategies) and then have
> > > > sub-pages for streaming- and batch-specific stuff. Or we treat
> > > > streaming as the common case and have a sub-section for batch. We
> > > > probably have to decide this case-by-case, but to me it feels like
> > > > this was the main problem with the old documentation structure
> > > > (content is a different story of course ;)).
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > Hi all!
> > > > >
> > > > > I posted another FLIP - this time about a suggestion to make the
> > > > > documentation more accessible.
> > > > >
> > > > > FLIP-3 - Organization of Documentation
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-3+-+Organization+of+Documentation
> > > > >
> > > > > The issue of accessibility of information came up repeatedly from
> > > users I
> > > > > talked to, so this is a suggestion how to improve this.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Greetings,
> > > > > Stephan
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message