Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B8E200B2B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:22:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 228E3160A6C; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 65C46160A28 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:22:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 2581 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2016 20:22:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 2570 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2016 20:22:50 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:22:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CFE511A74C6 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:22:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-W7BXQ3OVkr for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.mailbox.org (mx1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.212]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B975A5F242 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C4542008 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:22:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by gerste.heinlein-support.de (gerste.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.173]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id RruiRCsQoONZ for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:22:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP 1 - Flink Improvement Proposal To: dev@flink.apache.org References: From: "Matthias J. Sax" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:19:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4enH0VGGXiqGQ51AONSL3UEpIiHxbipnF" archived-at: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:22:52 -0000 --4enH0VGGXiqGQ51AONSL3UEpIiHxbipnF Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="LrCA02ImTI8p7P7skCGqCcqE3o4rc70ca" From: "Matthias J. Sax" To: dev@flink.apache.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP 1 - Flink Improvement Proposal References: In-Reply-To: --LrCA02ImTI8p7P7skCGqCcqE3o4rc70ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FLIP ?? Really? :D http://www.maya.tv/en/character/flip -Matthias On 06/28/2016 06:26 PM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > I'm proposing to add a formal process for how we deal with (major) > improvements to Flink and design docs. This has been mentioned several > times recently but we never took any decisive action to actually implem= ent > such a process so here we go. >=20 > Right now, we have Jira issues and we sometimes we have design docs tha= t we > keep in Google Docs. Jamie recently added links to those that he could = find > on the mailing list to the Flink wiki: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Apache+Flink+Home. Th= e > problem with these is that a) the comments on the Google Docs are not > reflected in Jira and the mailing list. There has been some very active= > discussion on some of the docs that most people would never notice. The= > community therefore might seem less active than it actually is. b) the > documents are not very discoverable, if we had a clearly defined place > where we put them and also prominently link to this on the Flink homepa= ge > this would greatly help people that try to find out about current > developments. >=20 > Kafka has a process like this: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Pro= posals. > They call it KIP, for Kafka Improvement Proposal. We could either adapt= > this for Flink or come up with our own process. Doing the former would = save > us a lot of time and I don't think the Kafka community would mind us > copying their process. The subject also hints at this, our process coul= d be > called FLIP, for Flink Improvement Proposal. >=20 > What do you think? Feedback is highly welcome. :-) >=20 > Cheers, > Aljoscha >=20 --LrCA02ImTI8p7P7skCGqCcqE3o4rc70ca-- --4enH0VGGXiqGQ51AONSL3UEpIiHxbipnF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXctvuAAoJEFCVK48prEZ49vMP/j5WCZlvef3uOvD9A+vBhMUs mq7tT17iDDqsWb4CtitX3nKQh+4mlPARAbCSg2gB3InoGtRWJoVEAsWA8Z4H3Xu5 Qgpx9ZQlgG44x1mHmykneremgsCgNr6qch3UAPAS1lXNuZYrZpw9mQrh4oqZ5hzS vzcvxZ42dLdFG6htg1lpGjjCimo0tMf8wq67xw7PPJoLhwmrZcUCqR8uW+6zQQ/W PDSHBNn5tETcJUnnEuXNXb/2e7D3uENLxzJrzMCd+vfFu/TNFRfJ4cn4Ehx2QS8S 3H9JqScxAdQwvWuWN5a4TUnDErIR4WTg7zjgzQaE4D4IiivLsl2J3y7JnLggLms4 Pr0sD0LgiLVLK/ITign59rjgBfz86Q7Pq18n5WF6QJDYxkyptQ89D8wcfZk0TVWE /IugREDEUkNQrovurAIe+3MVL28f1PWt5Kf07uCYoBc+Q5OsGKpgSUhvESsLPC+s hd7hUfRTmX9CZ1maKxOt/P3g0sWKke9w0yCCKcw2v6PM0qGTIwjQQGPmbVPGdutA faQ7Cu8UXi0I4WY1DByMPpCqzlqaJqcT9Npq8WPQiE7wyo8ydvVI9xgUJzDn35JV QN9FG9MLul2QumPMaPzhxC2YindH72ATwsgvIh9rboWycRw7bEZjLzqENcACzCRU 5lzgiGlLRPh9JHEjkCCl =9Lvh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4enH0VGGXiqGQ51AONSL3UEpIiHxbipnF--