Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+faj9wOji0WTt7hPZyFOMvU6ii6EpY73dBkLhUuHukSmVORYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+faj9wOji0WTt7hPZyFOMvU6ii6EpY73dBkLhUuHukSmVORYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:47:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CANMXwW0EeyxoxyJmhiPoKqZWnuy8QRznUaHe1EjDavqZZjAU+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Savepoints and memory statebackend
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3f02a6887c40533d5aaed
archived-at: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:47:47 -0000

--001a11c3f02a6887c40533d5aaed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,
theoretically, it could work (if I'm not missing anything). But the
savepoint would be lost as soon as the JobManager is shut down.

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Fri, 27 May 2016 at 18:09 Gyula F=C3=B3ra <gyula.fora@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey!
>
> The flink docs on savepoints say that they cannot be used in combination
> with the memory statebackend as the savepoint backend will only store
> pointers to the state.
>
>
> If i understand correctly these pointers are the StateHandles that are
> stored by the JobManager. In case of the Memory state backend the state i=
s
> stored serialized in the handle so I would assume it should work with
> savepoints as well.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Cheers,
> Gyula
>

--001a11c3f02a6887c40533d5aaed--