flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.0.1 Bugfix release
Date Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:19:55 GMT
Just a quick note: "[FLINK-3636] Add ThrottledIterator to WindowJoin jar"
is not needed on the release-1,0 branch as the example rewrite introducing
the ThrottledIterator is not present there. I see that Ufuk has already
pushed the commit there, it does no harm after all.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:

> Hey Suneel,
>
> From what I understand it is possible to work around the missing
> method by implementing it yourself (or copying the map partition
> implementation).
>
> Would it be OK for you to just do that and wait for the 1.1 release?
>
> – Ufuk
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org> wrote:
> > what about PR# 1829? We need it real bad for an upcoming release.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I just merged #1830 and will create a RC after cherry picking
> >> '[FLINK-3636] Add ThrottledIterator to WindowJoin jar' to the
> >> release-1.0 branch.
> >>
> >> Thanks for kicking off the discussion Aljoscha!
> >>
> >> – Ufuk
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Chiwan Park <chiwanpark@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Chiwan Park
> >> >
> >> >> On Mar 23, 2016, at 11:24 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >> I just went through the master and release-1.0 branch, and most
> >> important
> >> >> fixes are already in the release-1.0 branch.
> >> >> I would also move this commit into the release branch:
> >> >> "[FLINK-3636] Add ThrottledIterator to WindowJoin jar"
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/f09d68a05efb4afeb7b8498d35201e8324d6c096
> >> >>
> >> >> From the pull requests I would include:
> >> >> "[FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore"
> >> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830
> >> >>
> >> >> Anything else?
> >> >>
> >> >> I would like to manage the release, but I'm on vacation next week,
> so I
> >> >> think somebody else should do it ;)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> +1
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Till Rohrmann <
> trohrmann@apache.org>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>> +1
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Yes, there is also the Rich Scala Window Functions, and
the tests
> >> that
> >> >>> used
> >> >>>>> to address wrong JAR directories.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Big +1, let's get this rolling... ;)
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Aljoscha Krettek
<
> >> >>> aljoscha@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >> >>>>>>> I’m aware of one critical fix and one somewhat
critical fix
> since
> >> >>>>> 1.0.0.
> >> >>>>>> One concerns data loss in the RollingSink, the other
is a bug in
> a
> >> >>> window
> >> >>>>>> trigger. I would like to release a bugfix release since
some
> people
> >> >>> are
> >> >>>>>> restricted to using released versions and are also
depending on
> the
> >> >>>>>> RollingSink. For them, now having a bugfix release
would be a
> >> blocker.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> What do you think? Are there any other critical
bugs/fixes that
> we
> >> >>> are
> >> >>>>>> aware of?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Best,
> >> >>>>>>> Aljoscha
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message