flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC1)
Date Sat, 06 Feb 2016 16:34:30 GMT
+1 (binding)

  - Built the code (Linux x64, Scala 2.10, Hadoop 2.3.0)
  - Ran all tests
  - Checked that there are no cross-version dependencies
  - Checked that LICENSE and NOTICE are up to date
  - Check planVisualizer util
  - ran examples from command line
  - tested web frontend on Firefox and Chrome
  - ran program on multiple taskmanagers, killed one during execution,
recovery worked properly


Minor issue: The log4j.properties in "flink-runtime" causes a lot of test
exceptions to be printed, which looks confusing when running the tests.



On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com> wrote:

> Fair enough
>
> 2016-02-05 14:09 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>:
>
> > I would also be in favor of continuing the RC, if we find nothing more
> > problematic
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the RC. The documentation version is a really minor issue
> > > which most people won't even notice because they use the online
> > > documentation. I wouldn't create a new RC just for fixing that.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 05 Feb 2016, at 12:17, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I compared the RC1 branch to the release-0.10.2 tag and went over
> the
> > > diff
> > > >> (less than 2k changed lines, mostly added tests).
> > > >>
> > > >> Issues:
> > > >> - the docs/_config.yml needs to be updated to version 0.10.2
> > > >>
> > > >> Added / changed dependencies in pom files:
> > > >> - Kryo was added to flink-storm
> > > >> - ASM was added to flink-gelly-scala
> > > >> - zkclient was added to flink-connector-kafka
> > > >> - Netty was downgraded to version 4.0.27.Final in the root pom.xml
> > > >>
> > > >> All of these dependencies changes are fine because we had
> dependencies
> > > on
> > > >> these artifacts already.
> > > >> I did not see any added dependencies (web stuff, etc).
> > > >>
> > > >> -1 for the RC due to the non-updated docs config. However, I'd
> suggest
> > > to
> > > >> continue testing this RC before creating a new one.
> > > >
> > > > We had this issue before with the docs. I would actually like to not
> > > block the release on this, because the docs on the website are updated
> > from
> > > the 0.10 release branch anyways and this will only affect people who
> > check
> > > out the docs locally.
> > > >
> > > > If you insist or other people see this as a blocker as well, I can
> > > certainly create another RC.
> > > >
> > > > – Ufuk
> > > >
> > > > PS: I’ve added a note to the releasing Wiki entry.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message