flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC1)
Date Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:17:34 GMT
Fair enough

2016-02-05 14:09 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>:

> I would also be in favor of continuing the RC, if we find nothing more
> problematic
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the RC. The documentation version is a really minor issue
> > which most people won't even notice because they use the online
> > documentation. I wouldn't create a new RC just for fixing that.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 05 Feb 2016, at 12:17, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I compared the RC1 branch to the release-0.10.2 tag and went over the
> > diff
> > >> (less than 2k changed lines, mostly added tests).
> > >>
> > >> Issues:
> > >> - the docs/_config.yml needs to be updated to version 0.10.2
> > >>
> > >> Added / changed dependencies in pom files:
> > >> - Kryo was added to flink-storm
> > >> - ASM was added to flink-gelly-scala
> > >> - zkclient was added to flink-connector-kafka
> > >> - Netty was downgraded to version 4.0.27.Final in the root pom.xml
> > >>
> > >> All of these dependencies changes are fine because we had dependencies
> > on
> > >> these artifacts already.
> > >> I did not see any added dependencies (web stuff, etc).
> > >>
> > >> -1 for the RC due to the non-updated docs config. However, I'd suggest
> > to
> > >> continue testing this RC before creating a new one.
> > >
> > > We had this issue before with the docs. I would actually like to not
> > block the release on this, because the docs on the website are updated
> from
> > the 0.10 release branch anyways and this will only affect people who
> check
> > out the docs locally.
> > >
> > > If you insist or other people see this as a blocker as well, I can
> > certainly create another RC.
> > >
> > > – Ufuk
> > >
> > > PS: I’ve added a note to the releasing Wiki entry.
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message