Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9228F18D1F for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93530 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2016 18:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 93459 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2016 18:53:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 93448 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2016 18:53:28 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:53:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 78F191A07BD for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:53:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.981 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.981 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EVe9lhzn0C5u for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C4E1743F35 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id u188so360960866wmu.1 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:53:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=V54cnFXieBpeLuZOpeUeskCCYt4anaiL2FSLhMRrccc=; b=bAjz/KpOMi1svP0N8Ez1wLrMpGIDZOhbwTdVBBTnq4Ux4yi8sp1gGFbgZsQ7yy1OQp 0iMAbstDm4K06jg7Y1qOgzemeZzdloUjKhC0sx1ApXcVsyUOWxGhFcLHXZXyJa6zO5fi QteTv4oXb26eYVtjVVeoz4rjLfFOFUB3dT3jxxBECSd9YFVNOrLnMNFgMTdR4DHekYJZ yPt2nEdIf6TS7Sj0HMFVO36E/Cq6xjHxAabwJ7A4PxrUbr0/Xt0EVF4wP+7TEd+bbvGr 3w7O1xH8I9GHbrT+07dE9eLR8oh4fWYOF1m+bL8eV51dXq5v04BWtduO8wtg9t9Xkc4D 11CQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/pg61iDc+1c/UGU+zcXlGJG7owGDVHU1dJN8AKq8t8FZeUOkTvX1Gf9KgZlGZP53dmTBv7wsNPQ3TuUhV7cuW/p/sAA== X-Received: by 10.194.114.164 with SMTP id jh4mr5657061wjb.153.1452797605923; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:53:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.101] (ip5b40315a.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de. [91.64.49.90]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r4sm7274779wjy.39.2016.01.14.10.53.24 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:53:25 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: Dripping the Flink-on-Tez code for Flink 1.0 From: Ufuk Celebi In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:53:24 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0E9144F9-6D41-48C6-9773-EF7748BFC118@apache.org> References: <5DC91774-00B7-4CEA-A913-2063FCEF8677@apache.org> To: dev@flink.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) I=E2=80=99ve created an issue [1] and closed all other Tez issues. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3235 > On 11 Jan 2016, at 02:52, Henry Saputra = wrote: >=20 > +1 >=20 > I am always for simplifying our code base when possible. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Sunday, January 10, 2016, Stephan Ewen wrote: >=20 >> I was typing with fat fingers again. Meant "dropping code" of course, = not >> "dripping" ;-) >>=20 >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Fabian Hueske > > wrote: >>=20 >>> +1 >>>=20 >>> 2016-01-08 17:35 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann > >: >>>=20 >>>> +1 since it increase maintainability of the code base if it is not >> really >>>> used and thus removed. >>>>=20 >>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Ufuk Celebi > > wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> +1 >>>>>=20 >>>>> I wanted to make a similar proposal. >>>>>=20 >>>>> =E2=80=93 Ufuk >>>>>=20 >>>>>> On 08 Jan 2016, at 17:03, Kostas Tzoumas > > >>> wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> for clarification, I was talking about dropping the code, I am >> unsure >>>>> about >>>>>> the consequences of dripping code :-) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Kostas Tzoumas < >> ktzoumas@apache.org > >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> +1 from my side >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Flink on Tez never got a lot of user traction. It served well as = a >>>>>>> prototype of "this is possible", but since the core = functionality >>> will >>>>> be >>>>>>> subsumed by making Flink on YARN resource elastic, I don't see = any >>>>> reason >>>>>>> we should have it as part of the Flink codebase. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Kostas >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Stephan Ewen > > >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Hi all! >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Currently, Flink has a module to run batch program code on Tez >>> rather >>>>> than >>>>>>>> Flink's own distributed execution engine. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> I would suggest that we drop this code for the next release = (1.0) >>> as >>>>> part >>>>>>>> of a code consolidation: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> - There seems little in both the Flink and the Tez community to >>> use >>>>> and >>>>>>>> expand this functionality. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> - The original motivation (better exploit resource elasticity = in >>>> YARN) >>>>>>>> will no longer be valid in the near future. I am re-working the >>> YARN >>>>>>>> integration currently to make it more elastic and make it >> possible >>> to >>>>> run >>>>>>>> Flink on Mesos. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> - The Flink-on-Tez code is rather POC status. Large scale >> testing >>> it >>>>> and >>>>>>>> making adding all missing features will take more effort than >>> making >>>>>>>> Flink's own YARN integration resource elastic. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Please let me know what you think! >>>>>>>> Especially @Kostas, since you wrote the initial POC, I'd be >>>> interested >>>>> in >>>>>>>> your opinion. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>>>> Stephan >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20