flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias J. Sax" <mj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs
Date Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:37:08 GMT
+1

On 01/13/2016 11:51 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> @Stephan: You mean all tags should be protected, not only those under rel?
> 
> 2016-01-13 11:43 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org>:
> 
>> +1 for protecting the master branch.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Li, Chengxiang <chengxiang.li@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on the original style.
>>> Master branch disable force pushing in case of misusing and feature
>> branch
>>> enable force pushing for flexible developing.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gyula Fóra [mailto:gyfora@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:36 PM
>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs
>>>
>>> +1 for protecting the master branch.
>>>
>>> I also don't see any reason why anyone should force push there
>>>
>>> Gyula
>>>
>>> Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2016. jan. 13.,
>> Sze,
>>> 11:07):
>>>
>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>
>>>> Lately, ASF Infra has changed the write permissions of all Git
>>>> repositories twice.
>>>>
>>>> Originally, it was not possible to force into the master branch.
>>>> A few weeks ago, infra disabled also force pushing into other branches.
>>>>
>>>> Now, this has changed again after the issue was discussed with the ASF
>>>> board.
>>>> The current situation is the following:
>>>> - force pushing is allowed on all branched, including master
>>>> - branches and tags can be deleted (not sure if this applies as well
>>>> for the master branch)
>>>> - "the 'protected' portions of git to primarily focus on refs/tags/rel
>>>> - thus any tags under rel, will have their entire commit history."
>>>>
>>>> I am not 100% sure which exact parts of the repository are protected
>>>> now as I am not very much into the details of Git.
>>>> However, I believe we need to create new tags under rel for our
>>>> previous releases to protect them.
>>>>
>>>> In addition, I would like to propose to ask Infra to add protection
>>>> for the master branch. I can only recall very few situations where
>>>> changes had to be reverted. I am much more in favor of a reverting
>>>> commit now and then compared to a branch that can be arbitrarily
>> changed.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think about this?
>>>>
>>>> Best, Fabian
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 


Mime
View raw message