Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
Subject: Re: Flink Benchmarks have been included in BigDataBench
From: Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <1450404455308-9639.post@n3.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:22:17 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6171DCD3-1B6E-4495-BA00-F65122E208ED@apache.org>
References: <1450404455308-9639.post@n3.nabble.com>
To: dev@flink.apache.org


> On 18 Dec 2015, at 03:07, Xinhui Tian <tianxinhui@ict.ac.cn> wrote:
>=20
> Hello everyone!=20
>=20
> Earlier we have posted a topic about the plan of including Flink =
support in
> our big data benchmark, which is called BigDataBench. The benchmarks =
can be
> found on http://prof.ict.ac.cn/BigDataBench/. Now we have released a =
new
> version including Flink benchmarks. It is now a beta version and the
> benchmarks include basic batch processing like word count, grep, and
> iteration processing like page rank, delta page rank and KMeans. For =
better
> comparison with Spark, we used the KMeans++ algorithm, and also =
included a
> KMeans|| version.=20
>=20
> We have also released a graph benchmark including five benchmarks on =
Flink
> Gelly, Spark GraphX and GraphLab, and we believe such benchmarks may =
help
> users to compare those systems in an easy way.=20
>=20
> Other benchmarks such as streaming processing are in process.=20
>=20
> We also have got some preliminary results about the performance =
comparison
> of Hadoop, Spark and Flink, which has been put on website:
> http://www.bafst.com/top100.html

Thanks for notifying the Flink community!

The prelim results link doesn=E2=80=99t work though.

=E2=80=93 Ufuk