Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANC1h_uswvvwoK-n1rnu0tD3-THc9xXhO8D0=tJEjvWx7MxvjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGco--b9L-Ue03R5UHwAa95X+Z8h+KTfzQwYi0J3kYYB31d8JQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGco--bnRwLW6pwGUf9CW+0Q2KWXCyF=jGLEYhAyDioRbFUk8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANC1h_t9g1H7EuRxQAfyGWSjKAt4tMcbSCWSCsVzgTBx4FVNwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJZ2dcVghf_aQykpKG2AM=4HwU1ha=VU2003zN4ai7CCE0ZnuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+faj9wM0M0-0E51btb+3TBkn8jF1q8bNP+1UkSmQHPyXsEngw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELUF_DgNjP88mn8OCgykGBuvGV_JxmHS9iWtEDbG3rN8sz6YA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANC1h_uFgp3ELijLd3kG3ez0GT61pYMS=kewf868XdP0sgvpOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<56281166.097eb40a.c45e9.ffffdcd5@mx.google.com>
	<CAL3J2zT2ESfOC6c6Jkvjo1QXFG3LqEyCWHpZsLafTNgAvRqytg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGco--b=8YSh6LU659GLeUfNNViqropxMVFp2r_80cMWUWLXow@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANC1h_uswvvwoK-n1rnu0tD3-THc9xXhO8D0=tJEjvWx7MxvjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:28:03 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAJZ2dcVy1bSASRoN9=AcRo92KSR86=P1=NtOjfWeNkzmnUBdqg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)
From: Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb045ce9b396f0522ae1cf6

--047d7bb045ce9b396f0522ae1cf6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

I found an issue with the web interface. It only shows the last 5 finished
jobs and the "Jobs Finished" counter also goes up to 5.
I found FLINK-2206, but it seems that this was fixed for the old interface
and broken again in the new one?
Shall I open another issue or is there something I need to configure in the
new web interface and I haven't?

Thanks,
-V.

On 22 October 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:

> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888
>
> I would not disable YARN detached mode, it is used quite a bit by streami=
ng
> users and makes perfect sense for streaming jobs, which are always one-sh=
ot
> currently.
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I had a gut feeling this wouldn't be the last RC :)
> >
> > I second Stephan, Ufuk, and Fabian. It's a good idea to start testing t=
he
> > release candidate. We might discover more issues on the way. In the
> > meantime, let's fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 and push those to the
> > release-0.10 branch.
> >
> > Eager execution calls are not supported by the detached YARN execution
> > mode. The Flink standalone cluster mode doesn't have a detached mode.
> > Sachin was working on throwing a proper exception for programs that try
> to
> > submit a job which contains eager execution calls. In the course of
> > throwing a proper exception, he also added detached execution mode
> support
> > for the standalone cluster mode. The reason why eager execution doesn't
> > work with detached programs is that the client submits the first Flink
> job
> > (call to execute/count/collect/print) to the cluster and then returns a=
n
> > empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error if the user program tries to
> > access the ExecutionResult.
> >
> > Sachin's pull request hasn't been merged in time for the release. I wou=
ld
> > like Flink to support detached execution mode but I suggest to disable
> > detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can include a prop=
er
> > support for the next release.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode is faulty for
> > > interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most basic
> starting
> > > point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink run -m yarn-cluster -yd -n <>
> > > examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way.
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > > m. +91-9871457685
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske <fhueske@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 to that, Stephan.
> > > >
> > > > I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Stephan Ewen
> > > > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02
> > > > To: dev@flink.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0=
)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also found another
> > blocker
> > > > bug, so this RC will need a few patches.
> > > >
> > > > I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what would actually be t=
he
> > > > desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for a release
> blocker.
> > > >
> > > > I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 if possible, but not
> > block
> > > > the release on that. They seem to be very corner case. Good to fix
> > them,
> > > > but not blockers. Too many people are on the 0.10 SNAPSHOT right no=
w
> > and
> > > > too many urgent fixes are in that people wait to be available in a
> > > release.
> > > >
> > > > How about we start testing anyways, because I would expect us to fi=
nd
> > > more
> > > > issues, and we save time if we do not create a new release candidat=
e
> > for
> > > > each patch.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
> > > pompermaier@okkam.it
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I would also point out that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800 could be
> worth
> > of
> > > > > further investigations before this release
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Flavio
> > > > > On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula F=C3=B3ra" <gyfora@apache.org> wrote=
:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately I have to say -1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point of view.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=
=C5=91pont:
> > > 2015.
> > > > > okt.
> > > > > > 21., Sze, 20:07):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Awesome! Thanks Max :))
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have a couple of questions:
> > > > > > > - what about the blocker issue (according to the wiki)
> > FLINK-2747?
> > > > > > > - weren't we going to get rid of staging altogether?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > -V.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Super, thanks Max!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We should also bump the master to the next version then, to
> > > > separate
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > goes into release fixes and what goes into the next
> version...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT? ;-) That is a separate
> > thread,
> > > I
> > > > > > > guess...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> > > > mxm@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Release candidates have to be tested thoroughly.
> Therefore, I
> > > > would
> > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > everybody to take a look at the release page in the wiki:
> > > > > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I've compiled the checks into a document. I would like
> > everyone
> > > > to
> > > > > > > assign
> > > > > > > > > one of the checks in the documents to test the release
> > > candidate:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4=
CnLpLY/edit?usp=3Dsharing
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> > > > > mxm@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dear community,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The past months we have been working very hard to push
> > > towards
> > > > > > 0.10.
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > would like to propose the first release candidate.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
> Apache
> > > > Flink
> > > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > > > > > > > > b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Branch:
> > > > > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc0 (see
> > > > > > > > > >
> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=3Dflink.git
> > > )
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the key with
> fingerprint
> > > > > > C2909CBF:
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at=
:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047
> > > > > > > > > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink
> > 0.10.0.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
> > > majority
> > > > > of
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--047d7bb045ce9b396f0522ae1cf6--