Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org
Message-ID: <56281166.097eb40a.c45e9.ffffdcd5@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>,
	"dev@flink.apache.org" <dev@flink.apache.org>
From: fhueske <fhueske@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:27:49 +0200
Importance: normal
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANC1h_uFgp3ELijLd3kG3ez0GT61pYMS=kewf868XdP0sgvpOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGco--b9L-Ue03R5UHwAa95X+Z8h+KTfzQwYi0J3kYYB31d8JQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGco--bnRwLW6pwGUf9CW+0Q2KWXCyF=jGLEYhAyDioRbFUk8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANC1h_t9g1H7EuRxQAfyGWSjKAt4tMcbSCWSCsVzgTBx4FVNwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJZ2dcVghf_aQykpKG2AM=4HwU1ha=VU2003zN4ai7CCE0ZnuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+faj9wM0M0-0E51btb+3TBkn8jF1q8bNP+1UkSmQHPyXsEngw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAELUF_DgNjP88mn8OCgykGBuvGV_JxmHS9iWtEDbG3rN8sz6YA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANC1h_uFgp3ELijLd3kG3ez0GT61pYMS=kewf868XdP0sgvpOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_2B48D91D-3885-417C-BF43-09AA26632852_"

--_2B48D91D-3885-417C-BF43-09AA26632852_
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

+1 to that, Stephan.

I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800.=20


From: Stephan Ewen
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)


>From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also found another blocker
bug, so this RC will need a few patches.

I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what would actually be the
desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for a release blocker.

I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 if possible, but not block
the release on that. They seem to be very corner case. Good to fix them,
but not blockers. Too many people are on the 0.10 SNAPSHOT right now and
too many urgent fixes are in that people wait to be available in a release.

How about we start testing anyways, because I would expect us to find more
issues, and we save time if we do not create a new release candidate for
each patch.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <pompermaier@okkam.it>
wrote:

> I would also point out that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800 could be worth of
> further investigations before this release
>
> Best,
> Flavio
> On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula F=C3=B3ra" <gyfora@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge :)
> >
> > Unfortunately I have to say -1
> >
> > FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point of view.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gyula
> >
> > Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pon=
t: 2015.
> okt.
> > 21., Sze, 20:07):
> >
> > > Awesome! Thanks Max :))
> > >
> > > I have a couple of questions:
> > > - what about the blocker issue (according to the wiki) FLINK-2747?
> > > - weren't we going to get rid of staging altogether?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > -V.
> > >
> > > On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Super, thanks Max!
> > > >
> > > > We should also bump the master to the next version then, to separat=
e
> > what
> > > > goes into release fixes and what goes into the next version...
> > > >
> > > > Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT? ;-) That is a separate thread, I
> > > guess...
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org=
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Release candidates have to be tested thoroughly. Therefore, I wou=
ld
> > > like
> > > > > everybody to take a look at the release page in the wiki:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
> > > > >
> > > > > I've compiled the checks into a document. I would like everyone t=
o
> > > assign
> > > > > one of the checks in the documents to test the release candidate:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4=
CnLpLY/edit?usp=3Dsharing
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> mxm@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The past months we have been working very hard to push towards
> > 0.10.
> > > I
> > > > > > would like to propose the first release candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flin=
k
> > > > version
> > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > > > > b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Branch:
> > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc0 (see
> > > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=3Dflink.git)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > C2909CBF:
> > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-104=
7
> > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority
> of
> > at
> > > > > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


--_2B48D91D-3885-417C-BF43-09AA26632852_--