flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)
Date Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:09:52 GMT
Thanks Till for bringing this up. This is one of the blockers we r facing
now for Flink-Mahout integration.

It would be great to have this in 0.10.

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org> wrote:

> I found another issue (FLINK-2894
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2894>) while helping the
> mahout guys with the flink bindings for Samsara. Currently we don't allow
> to register default serializer for Kryo. This means it is not possible to
> specify a serializer for a base class and all its subclasses. In order to
> push the flink integration with Samsara, I would like to include a fix for
> it in 0.10.
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 22, 2015 3:01 PM, "Maximilian Michels" <mxm@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > @Stephan: That's right, the detached mode is very useful for streaming
> > > programs. Let's see if we can merge Sachin's pull request to give more
> > > meaningful exceptions in case of user programs which are not
> > > compatible with the detached execution mode.
> >
> > I'll leave it up to you guys to make a decision on it then. But something
> > needs to be done about it. :')
> >
> > > @Vasia: That's a feature :) You can adjust the number of old jobs to
> > > be kept by setting 'jobmanager.web.history' (default is 5).
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > > <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I found an issue with the web interface. It only shows the last 5
> > finished
> > > > jobs and the "Jobs Finished" counter also goes up to 5.
> > > > I found FLINK-2206, but it seems that this was fixed for the old
> > interface
> > > > and broken again in the new one?
> > > > Shall I open another issue or is there something I need to configure
> in
> > the
> > > > new web interface and I haven't?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -V.
> > > >
> > > > On 22 October 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888
> > > >>
> > > >> I would not disable YARN detached mode, it is used quite a bit by
> > streaming
> > > >> users and makes perfect sense for streaming jobs, which are always
> > one-shot
> > > >> currently.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Maximilian Michels <
> mxm@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I had a gut feeling this wouldn't be the last RC :)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I second Stephan, Ufuk, and Fabian. It's a good idea to start
> > testing the
> > > >> > release candidate. We might discover more issues on the way.
In
> the
> > > >> > meantime, let's fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 and push those
to
> the
> > > >> > release-0.10 branch.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Eager execution calls are not supported by the detached YARN
> > execution
> > > >> > mode. The Flink standalone cluster mode doesn't have a detached
> > mode.
> > > >> > Sachin was working on throwing a proper exception for programs
> that
> > try
> > > >> to
> > > >> > submit a job which contains eager execution calls. In the course
> of
> > > >> > throwing a proper exception, he also added detached execution
mode
> > > >> support
> > > >> > for the standalone cluster mode. The reason why eager execution
> > doesn't
> > > >> > work with detached programs is that the client submits the first
> > Flink
> > > >> job
> > > >> > (call to execute/count/collect/print) to the cluster and then
> > returns an
> > > >> > empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error if the user program
> tries
> > to
> > > >> > access the ExecutionResult.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sachin's pull request hasn't been merged in time for the release.
> I
> > would
> > > >> > like Flink to support detached execution mode but I suggest to
> > disable
> > > >> > detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can include
a
> > proper
> > > >> > support for the next release.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Sachin Goel <
> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode is
faulty
> > for
> > > >> > > interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most
basic
> > > >> starting
> > > >> > > point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink run -m yarn-cluster -yd
-n <>
> > > >> > > examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > > >> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > > >> > > m. +91-9871457685
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske <fhueske@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > +1 to that, Stephan.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > From: Stephan Ewen
> > > >> > > > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02
> > > >> > > > To: dev@flink.apache.org
> > > >> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > (release-0.10.0-rc0)
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also
found
> > another
> > > >> > blocker
> > > >> > > > bug, so this RC will need a few patches.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what would
actually
> > be the
> > > >> > > > desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for
a release
> > > >> blocker.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 if possible,
but
> > not
> > > >> > block
> > > >> > > > the release on that. They seem to be very corner case.
Good to
> > fix
> > > >> > them,
> > > >> > > > but not blockers. Too many people are on the 0.10 SNAPSHOT
> right
> > now
> > > >> > and
> > > >> > > > too many urgent fixes are in that people wait to be
available
> in
> > a
> > > >> > > release.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > How about we start testing anyways, because I would
expect us
> to
> > find
> > > >> > > more
> > > >> > > > issues, and we save time if we do not create a new
release
> > candidate
> > > >> > for
> > > >> > > > each patch.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Flavio Pompermaier
<
> > > >> > > pompermaier@okkam.it
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > I would also point out that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800
could
> be
> > > >> worth
> > > >> > of
> > > >> > > > > further investigations before this release
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Best,
> > > >> > > > > Flavio
> > > >> > > > > On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula Fóra" <gyfora@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Thanks Max for the effort, this is going
to be huge :)
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Unfortunately I have to say -1
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from
my point of
> > view.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > >> > > > > > Gyula
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
ezt írta
> > (időpont:
> > > >> > > 2015.
> > > >> > > > > okt.
> > > >> > > > > > 21., Sze, 20:07):
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Awesome! Thanks Max :))
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > I have a couple of questions:
> > > >> > > > > > > - what about the blocker issue (according
to the wiki)
> > > >> > FLINK-2747?
> > > >> > > > > > > - weren't we going to get rid of staging
altogether?
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > >> > > > > > > -V.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan
Ewen <
> > sewen@apache.org
> > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Super, thanks Max!
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > We should also bump the master
to the next version
> then,
> > to
> > > >> > > > separate
> > > >> > > > > > what
> > > >> > > > > > > > goes into release fixes and what
goes into the next
> > > >> version...
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT?
;-) That is a
> separate
> > > >> > thread,
> > > >> > > I
> > > >> > > > > > > guess...
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM,
Maximilian Michels <
> > > >> > > > mxm@apache.org>
> > > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Release candidates have to
be tested thoroughly.
> > > >> Therefore, I
> > > >> > > > would
> > > >> > > > > > > like
> > > >> > > > > > > > > everybody to take a look at
the release page in the
> > wiki:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > I've compiled the checks into
a document. I would
> like
> > > >> > everyone
> > > >> > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > assign
> > > >> > > > > > > > > one of the checks in the documents
to test the
> release
> > > >> > > candidate:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4CnLpLY/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10
PM, Maximilian Michels
> <
> > > >> > > > > mxm@apache.org>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear community,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > The past months we have
been working very hard to
> > push
> > > >> > > towards
> > > >> > > > > > 0.10.
> > > >> > > > > > > I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > would like to propose
the first release candidate.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > ===================================
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing
the following candidate
> as
> > > >> Apache
> > > >> > > > Flink
> > > >> > > > > > > > version
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > The commit to be voted
on:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Branch:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc0 (see
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> > > >> > > )
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > The release artifacts
to be voted on can be found
> > at:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are
signed with the key with
> > > >> fingerprint
> > > >> > > > > > C2909CBF:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > The staging repository
for this release can be
> found
> > at:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing
this package as Apache
> > Flink
> > > >> > 0.10.0.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > The vote is open for
the next 72 hours and passes
> if
> > a
> > > >> > > majority
> > > >> > > > > of
> > > >> > > > > > at
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > least three +1 PMC votes
are cast.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > The vote ends on Monday
October 26, 2015.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package
as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release
this package because ...
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > ===================================
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message