flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Pulling Streaming out of staging and project restructure
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:27:27 GMT
+1 For pulling out and the restructure. Enough good arguments have been
brought forward and I agree with all of them.

On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 at 17:47 Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:

>
> > On 01 Oct 2015, at 16:48, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > @Chesnay: Nothing prevents projects from getting stuck there. But at
> least
> > we don't have two staging repositories (dist, staging). Also I would not
> > say that there has been no graduation out of staging. Yarn was also there
> > once, streaming and gelly are currently leaving it. So I would actually
> say
> > it worked.
> >
> > One more thing: Can we actually put the web submission client into a
> > separate module until we have something new and better?
> >
> > It does really not fit into "flink-clients". It makes Flink users pull
> the
> > jetty dependencies even if they never use them for example when running
> > Flink from an IDE.
>
> I think most people use it as part of the binary distribution and nothing
> else anyways. So +1.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message