flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maximilian Michels <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)
Date Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:36:20 GMT
Now that the pressing issues of the rc0 have been fixed and pushed to the
release-0.10 branch, I would like to go ahead and create a new rc1.

There are still FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 but no immediate fix seems to be
available.

Any further issues we would like to fix in the new release candidate?

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for bringing up the projects and the record API:
>
>  - Concerning the projects: Nice to have, but not critical, unless we want
> to change the names of the Maven artifacts. I would rather not rush this
>
>  - Removal of Record API. Good thing to have, but should not be a release
> blocker. I would be fine with doing this for 1.0
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, it took IntelliJ some time to figure out all the consequences of
> > removing the Record API.
> > Seems to be more than I initially expected.
> >
> > @Chesnay, do you want to help? I would push my current version to my
> > repository and you could take over some packages and fix the tests. Just
> > reply to me directly to coordinate. Thanks.
> >
> > 2015-10-22 16:45 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > I just deleted the Record API to check what would break.
> > > Doesn't look too scary, just a few tests that need to be adapted. I'm
> > > right in the middle of that. Hope to open a PR soon.
> > >
> > > 2015-10-22 16:42 GMT+02:00 Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org>:
> > >
> > >> @RecordAPI: Yes, i was curious where we are at regarding the removal
> of
> > >> the Record API.
> > >> If there are still tests left to port (or other related things) I'd be
> > >> more than happy to do it (got a /lot/ of free time on my hands).
> > >> The related JIRA issues weren't particularly helpful though in
> figuring
> > >> out what still needs to be done.
> > >>
> > >> @Project Restructuring: I prefer doing it now.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 22.10.2015 15:54, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> This reminded me that at some point we wanted to remove the old
> record
> > >>> API (
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1681). I think that
> > Chesnay
> > >>> checked with Henry on this topic in JIRA.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I'd like to bring up Vasia's question on the project structure.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Stephan started the discussion and proposed a new project structure
> > >>>> about
> > >>>> three weeks ago [1].
> > >>>> The proposal was refined a bit and eventually backed by many +1s.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Do we want to make this happen in 0.10 or do we postpone it after
> the
> > >>>> release?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>> Fabian
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1][
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCANC1h_u6qtEsF1WCcoU1d38JGd%2BXTAQWmvp9Stx4vfe68BOjBw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2015-10-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We r actually targeting Flink 0.10, since 0.10 would be out by
the
> > time
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> we
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> have Flink-Mahout integration in place.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Till Rohrmann <
> trohrmann@apache.org
> > >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Forget my last mail. Just found out that the Mahout guys are
still
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> running
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> on 0.9-SNAPSHOT.
> > >>>>>> ​
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Till Rohrmann <
> > trohrmann@apache.org>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I found another issue (FLINK-2894
> > >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2894>)
while
> helping
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> mahout guys with the flink bindings for Samsara. Currently
we don't
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> allow
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> to register default serializer for Kryo. This means it
is not
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> possible
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> specify a serializer for a base class and all its subclasses.
In
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> order
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> push the flink integration with Samsara, I would like to
include a
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> fix
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> for
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> it in 0.10.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2015 3:01 PM, "Maximilian Michels" <mxm@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> @Stephan: That's right, the detached mode is very useful for
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> streaming
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> programs. Let's see if we can merge Sachin's pull request
to give
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> more
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> meaningful exceptions in case of user programs which are
not
> > >>>>>>>>> compatible with the detached execution mode.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I'll leave it up to you guys to make a decision
on it then. But
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> something
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> needs to be done about it. :')
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> @Vasia: That's a feature :) You can adjust the
number of old
> jobs
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> be kept by setting 'jobmanager.web.history' (default is 5).
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vasiliki
Kalavri
> > >>>>>>>>> <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I found an issue with the web interface.
It only shows the
> last
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 5
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> finished
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> jobs and the "Jobs Finished" counter also goes
up to 5.
> > >>>>>>>>>> I found FLINK-2206, but it seems that this
was fixed for the
> old
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> interface
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> and broken again in the new one?
> > >>>>>>>>>> Shall I open another issue or is there
something I need to
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> configure
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> new web interface and I haven't?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>> -V.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 22 October 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Ewen
<sewen@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I would not disable YARN detached mode,
it is used quite a
> bit
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> by
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> streaming
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> users and makes perfect sense for streaming
jobs, which are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> always
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> one-shot
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> currently.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Maximilian
Michels <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> mxm@apache.org
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I had a gut feeling this wouldn't be
the last RC :)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I second Stephan, Ufuk, and Fabian.
It's a good idea to
> start
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> testing the
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> release candidate. We might discover more issues
on the way.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> In
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> meantime, let's fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 and push
those
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> release-0.10 branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Eager execution calls are not supported
by the detached YARN
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> execution
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> mode. The Flink standalone cluster mode doesn't
have a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> detached
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> mode.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Sachin was working on throwing a proper exception
for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> programs
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> that
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> try
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> submit a job which contains eager
execution calls. In the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> course
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> throwing a proper exception, he also added detached
execution
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> mode
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> support
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> for the standalone cluster mode.
The reason why eager
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> execution
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> doesn't
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> work with detached programs is that the client
submits the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> first
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Flink
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> job
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> (call to execute/count/collect/print)
to the cluster and
> then
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> returns an
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error
if the user
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> program
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> tries
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> access the ExecutionResult.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sachin's pull request hasn't been
merged in time for the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> release. I
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> would
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> like Flink to support detached execution mode
but I suggest
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> disable
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> detached execution mode for YARN in this release.
We can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> include
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> proper
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> support for the next release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50 AM,
Sachin Goel <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if it's a blocker, but
the yarn detached mode is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> faulty
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> interactive programs with eager execution calls.
The most
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> basic
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> starting
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink
run -m yarn-cluster -yd -n
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Sachin Goel
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> m. +91-9871457685
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57
AM, fhueske <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> fhueske@gmail.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 to that, Stephan.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can help with FLINK-2763
or FLINK-2800.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October
22, 2015 0:02
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release
Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (release-0.10.0-rc0)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  From my side 2888 is a
valid blocker. Aljoscha also found
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> another
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> blocker
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bug, so this RC will need a
few patches.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think for 2824 there
was no consensus to what would
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> actually
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> be the
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate
for a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> blocker.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I would try and fix FLINK-2763
and FLINK-2800 if
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> but
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> not
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> block
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release on that. They seem
to be very corner case.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> fix
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> them,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> but not blockers. Too many
people are on the 0.10
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> right
> > >>>>>>>> now
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> too many urgent fixes are in
that people wait to be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> available
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about we start testing
anyways, because I would
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> expect
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> us
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>> find
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> more
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues, and we save time
if we do not create a new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> candidate
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> each patch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at
11:44 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pompermaier@okkam.it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also point out
that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> worth
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> further investigations before
this release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flavio
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Oct 2015 23:33,
"Gyula Fóra" <gyfora@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to
be huge
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Unfortunately I have to say -1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-2888 and
FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> view.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vasiliki Kalavri
<vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> ezt
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> írta
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> (időpont:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 2015.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> okt.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21., Sze, 20:07):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome! Thanks
Max :))
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple
of questions:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - what about
the blocker issue (according to the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> FLINK-2747?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - weren't we going to get rid
of staging
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -V.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 October
2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewen@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Super, thanks Max!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should
also bump the master to the next
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> then,
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> separate
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes into release
fixes and what goes into the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> version...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT?
;-) That is a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> thread,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed,
Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels <
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> mxm@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release
candidates have to be tested
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Therefore, I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> would
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everybody
to take a look at the release page in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> wiki:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I've compiled the checks into a document. I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> like
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> everyone
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assign
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of
the checks in the documents to test the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> candidate:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4CnLpLY/edit?usp=sharing
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels
<
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> mxm@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear
community,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The past months we have been working very
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> push
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> towards
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like
to propose the first release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ===================================
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please vote on releasing the following
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Apache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Flink
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The commit to be voted on:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Branch:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
release-0.10.0-rc0 (see
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> )
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts to
be voted on can be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> at:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the key
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> fingerprint
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> C2909CBF:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The staging repository for this release can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> found
> > >>>>>>>> at:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this
package as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Flink
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0.10.0.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for the next
72 hours and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> if
> > >>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> majority
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least three
+1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> ===================================
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message