flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)
Date Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:38:54 GMT
+1 for a new RC.

I tried to reproduce FLINK-2800 but did not succeed yet. I will spend a bit
more time on it and if we have a fix within time (before a new RC) we can
include it.

2015-10-26 10:36 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org>:

> Now that the pressing issues of the rc0 have been fixed and pushed to the
> release-0.10 branch, I would like to go ahead and create a new rc1.
>
> There are still FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 but no immediate fix seems to be
> available.
>
> Any further issues we would like to fix in the new release candidate?
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for bringing up the projects and the record API:
> >
> >  - Concerning the projects: Nice to have, but not critical, unless we
> want
> > to change the names of the Maven artifacts. I would rather not rush this
> >
> >  - Removal of Record API. Good thing to have, but should not be a release
> > blocker. I would be fine with doing this for 1.0
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm, it took IntelliJ some time to figure out all the consequences of
> > > removing the Record API.
> > > Seems to be more than I initially expected.
> > >
> > > @Chesnay, do you want to help? I would push my current version to my
> > > repository and you could take over some packages and fix the tests.
> Just
> > > reply to me directly to coordinate. Thanks.
> > >
> > > 2015-10-22 16:45 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > I just deleted the Record API to check what would break.
> > > > Doesn't look too scary, just a few tests that need to be adapted. I'm
> > > > right in the middle of that. Hope to open a PR soon.
> > > >
> > > > 2015-10-22 16:42 GMT+02:00 Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > >> @RecordAPI: Yes, i was curious where we are at regarding the removal
> > of
> > > >> the Record API.
> > > >> If there are still tests left to port (or other related things) I'd
> be
> > > >> more than happy to do it (got a /lot/ of free time on my hands).
> > > >> The related JIRA issues weren't particularly helpful though in
> > figuring
> > > >> out what still needs to be done.
> > > >>
> > > >> @Project Restructuring: I prefer doing it now.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 22.10.2015 15:54, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> This reminded me that at some point we wanted to remove the old
> > record
> > > >>> API (
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1681). I think that
> > > Chesnay
> > > >>> checked with Henry on this topic in JIRA.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'd like to bring up Vasia's question on the project structure.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Stephan started the discussion and proposed a new project
> structure
> > > >>>> about
> > > >>>> three weeks ago [1].
> > > >>>> The proposal was refined a bit and eventually backed by many
+1s.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Do we want to make this happen in 0.10 or do we postpone it
after
> > the
> > > >>>> release?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>> Fabian
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1][
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCANC1h_u6qtEsF1WCcoU1d38JGd%2BXTAQWmvp9Stx4vfe68BOjBw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 2015-10-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org>:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> We r actually targeting Flink 0.10, since 0.10 would be out
by the
> > > time
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> we
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> have Flink-Mahout integration in place.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Till Rohrmann <
> > trohrmann@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Forget my last mail. Just found out that the Mahout guys
are
> still
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> running
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> on 0.9-SNAPSHOT.
> > > >>>>>> ​
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Till Rohrmann <
> > > trohrmann@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I found another issue (FLINK-2894
> > > >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2894>)
while
> > helping
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> the
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> mahout guys with the flink bindings for Samsara. Currently
we
> don't
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> allow
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> to register default serializer for Kryo. This means
it is not
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> possible
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> specify a serializer for a base class and all its
subclasses. In
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> order
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> push the flink integration with Samsara, I would like
to
> include a
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> fix
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> for
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> it in 0.10.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2015 3:01 PM, "Maximilian Michels"
<mxm@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> @Stephan: That's right, the detached mode is very useful
for
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> streaming
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> programs. Let's see if we can merge Sachin's pull
request to
> give
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> more
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> meaningful exceptions in case of user programs which
are not
> > > >>>>>>>>> compatible with the detached execution
mode.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I'll leave it up to you guys to make a decision
on it then.
> But
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> something
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> needs to be done about it. :')
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> @Vasia: That's a feature :) You can adjust
the number of old
> > jobs
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> be kept by setting 'jobmanager.web.history' (default is
5).
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vasiliki
Kalavri
> > > >>>>>>>>> <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I found an issue with the web interface.
It only shows the
> > last
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> 5
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> finished
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> jobs and the "Jobs Finished" counter also
goes up to 5.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I found FLINK-2206, but it seems that
this was fixed for the
> > old
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> interface
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> and broken again in the new one?
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Shall I open another issue or is there
something I need to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> configure
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> new web interface and I haven't?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> -V.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 22 October 2015 at 11:20, Stephan
Ewen <sewen@apache.org
> >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I would not disable YARN detached
mode, it is used quite a
> > bit
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> by
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> streaming
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> users and makes perfect sense for streaming
jobs, which are
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> always
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> one-shot
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> currently.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03
AM, Maximilian Michels <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> mxm@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I had a gut feeling this wouldn't
be the last RC :)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I second Stephan, Ufuk, and
Fabian. It's a good idea to
> > start
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> testing the
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> release candidate. We might discover more
issues on the way.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> In
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> meantime, let's fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800
and push those
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> release-0.10 branch.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Eager execution calls are
not supported by the detached
> YARN
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> execution
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> mode. The Flink standalone cluster mode
doesn't have a
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> detached
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> mode.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Sachin was working on throwing a proper
exception for
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> programs
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> that
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> try
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> submit a job which contains
eager execution calls. In the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> course
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> throwing a proper exception, he also added detached
execution
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> mode
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> support
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for the standalone cluster
mode. The reason why eager
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> execution
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> doesn't
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> work with detached programs is that the
client submits the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> first
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Flink
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> job
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (call to execute/count/collect/print)
to the cluster and
> > then
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> returns an
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error
if the user
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> program
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> tries
> > > >>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> access the ExecutionResult.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sachin's pull request hasn't
been merged in time for the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> release. I
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> would
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> like Flink to support detached execution
mode but I suggest
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> disable
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> detached execution mode for YARN in this
release. We can
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> include
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> a
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> proper
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> support for the next release.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50
AM, Sachin Goel <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if it's a blocker,
but the yarn detached mode is
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> faulty
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> for
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> interactive programs with eager execution
calls. The most
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> basic
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> starting
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink
run -m yarn-cluster -yd -n
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Sachin Goel
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science, IIT
Delhi
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> m. +91-9871457685
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at
3:57 AM, fhueske <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fhueske@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 to that, Stephan.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can help with FLINK-2763
or FLINK-2800.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October
22, 2015 0:02
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE]
Release Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (release-0.10.0-rc0)
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  From my side 2888
is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also
> found
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> another
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> blocker
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bug, so this RC will need
a few patches.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think for 2824 there
was no consensus to what would
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> actually
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> be the
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> desired behavior, which makes it a bad
candidate for a
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> blocker.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I would try and fix FLINK-2763
and FLINK-2800 if
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> but
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> not
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> block
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release on that. They
seem to be very corner case.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> fix
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> them,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> but not blockers. Too
many people are on the 0.10
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> right
> > > >>>>>>>> now
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> too many urgent fixes
are in that people wait to be
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> available
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>> a
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> release.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about we start
testing anyways, because I would
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> expect
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> us
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>> find
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> more
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues, and we save
time if we do not create a new
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> candidate
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> for
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> each patch.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015
at 11:44 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pompermaier@okkam.it
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also point
out that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> be
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> worth
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> further investigations
before this release
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flavio
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Oct 2015
23:33, "Gyula Fóra" <gyfora@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Max for the effort, this is going
to be huge
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Unfortunately I have to say -1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-2888
and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> view.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vasiliki Kalavri
<vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> ezt
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> írta
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> (időpont:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> 2015.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> okt.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21., Sze,
20:07):
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome! Thanks
Max :))
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have
a couple of questions:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - what
about the blocker issue (according to the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> FLINK-2747?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - weren't we going to
get rid of staging
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -V.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21
October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewen@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Super, thanks Max!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
should also bump the master to the next
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> then,
> > > >>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> separate
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes into
release fixes and what goes into the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> version...
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT?
;-) That is a
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> thread,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess...
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On
Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels
<
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> mxm@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release
candidates have to be tested
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Therefore, I
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everybody
to take a look at the release page in
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> wiki:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> I've compiled the checks into a document. I
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> like
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> everyone
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assign
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
of the checks in the documents to test the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> candidate:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4CnLpLY/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels
<
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> mxm@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Dear community,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The past months we have been working very
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
hard
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> push
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> towards
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
like to propose the first release
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
candidate.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> ===================================
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please vote on releasing the following
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
candidate
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> as
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Apache
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Flink
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
0.10.0:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The commit to be voted on:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Branch:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
release-0.10.0-rc0 (see
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> )
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts
to be voted on can be
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
found
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> at:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the key
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
with
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> fingerprint
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> C2909CBF:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The staging repository for this release can
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
be
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> found
> > > >>>>>>>> at:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing
this package as
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Apache
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Flink
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> 0.10.0.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for the
next 72 hours and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
passes
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> if
> > > >>>>>>>> a
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> majority
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least
three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
0.10.0
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> ===================================
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message