flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Build get stuck at BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest
Date Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:55:58 GMT
Yes, you're right. BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest has actually finished :-)
Sorry for the confusion! I'll wait for your fix then, thanks!

On 21 September 2015 at 22:51, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:

> I am actually very happy that it is not the
> "BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest", that would be hell to debug...
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Ah, actually it is a different test. I think you got confused by the
> > sysout log, because multiple parallel tests print there (that makes it
> not
> > always obvious which one hangs).
> >
> > The test is the "SocketClientSinkTest.testSocketSinkRetryAccess()" test.
> > You can see that by looking in which test case the "main" thread is
> stuck,
> >
> > This test is very unstable, but, fortunately, I made a fix 1h ago and it
> > is being tested on Travis right now :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Stephan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Locally yes.
> >>
> >> Here's the stack trace:
> >>
> >>
> >> 2015-09-21 22:22:46
> >> Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.75-b04 mixed
> mode):
> >>
> >> "Attach Listener" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d104e800 nid=0x4013
> waiting
> >> on condition [0x0000000000000000]
> >>    java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> >>
> >> "Service Thread" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d3807000 nid=0x4c03
> runnable
> >> [0x0000000000000000]
> >>    java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> >>
> >> "C2 CompilerThread1" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d2001000 nid=0x4a03
> >> waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
> >>    java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> >>
> >> "C2 CompilerThread0" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d201e000 nid=0x4803
> >> waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
> >>    java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> >>
> >> "Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d3012800 nid=0x451b
> >> runnable [0x0000000000000000]
> >>    java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> >>
> >> "Finalizer" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d4005800 nid=0x3303 in
> >> Object.wait() [0x000000011430d000]
> >>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
> >> at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
> >> - waiting on <0x00000007ef504858> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
> >> at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:135)
> >> - locked <0x00000007ef504858> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
> >> at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:151)
> >> at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:209)
> >>
> >> "Reference Handler" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d480b000 nid=0x3103 in
> >> Object.wait() [0x000000011420a000]
> >>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
> >> at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
> >> - waiting on <0x00000007ef504470> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
> >> at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503)
> >> at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133)
> >> - locked <0x00000007ef504470> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
> >>
> >> "main" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d4800000 nid=0xd03 runnable
> >> [0x000000010b764000]
> >>    java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> >> at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
> >> at
> >>
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.accept(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:398)
> >> at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:530)
> >> at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:498)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.SocketClientSinkTest.testSocketSinkRetryAccess(SocketClientSinkTest.java:315)
> >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> >> at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> >> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
> >> at
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> >>
> >> "VM Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d4005000 nid=0x2f03 runnable
> >>
> >> "GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d2005800 nid=0x1f03
> >> runnable
> >>
> >> "GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1800000 nid=0x2103
> >> runnable
> >>
> >> "GC task thread#2 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1804800 nid=0x2303
> >> runnable
> >>
> >> "GC task thread#3 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1805000 nid=0x2503
> >> runnable
> >>
> >> "GC task thread#4 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1805800 nid=0x2703
> >> runnable
> >>
> >> "GC task thread#5 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1806800 nid=0x2903
> >> runnable
> >>
> >> "GC task thread#6 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1807000 nid=0x2b03
> >> runnable
> >>
> >> "GC task thread#7 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1807800 nid=0x2d03
> >> runnable
> >>
> >> "VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1006000 nid=0x4e03
> waiting
> >> on condition
> >>
> >> JNI global references: 193
> >>
> >>
> >> On 21 September 2015 at 22:13, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > This happened locally on your machine?
> >> >
> >> > Can you dump the stack-trace and post it? "jps <processid> >
> >> > stacktrace.txt" or so...
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi squirrels,
> >> > >
> >> > > I've been meaning to merge a PR (#1520), but my local maven build
> gets
> >> > > stuck at
> >> > >
> org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest.
> >> > > It looks like a deadlock.. The build just hangs there and top shows
> no
> >> > > CPU/memory load. Anyone else has experienced the same? I'm on OS X
> >> 10.10.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks!
> >> > > -Vasia.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message