flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias J. Sax" <mj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Releasing 0.10.0-milestone1
Date Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:54:17 GMT
I justed opened a PR for FLINK-2632: "Web Client does not respect the
class loader of submitted jobs"

https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1114

-Matthias


On 09/10/2015 11:49 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> All these bugs reported by users and its just four of them of which 2 are
> already fixed.
> It should be possible to fix them in a day.
> 
> 2015-09-10 11:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>:
> 
>> Thank you very much for taking care of the release management!
>>
>> I'm not sure whether it makes sense to block a "preview" release on so many
>> bug fixes. It feels like 80% of our commits are bugfixes or stability
>> improvements anyways, so we would wait infinitely to release the milestone
>> if we wait for all of them.
>>
>> For example for the class loader issue in the web client issue, Max (who
>> initially brought the issue to our attention) also said: "Would be nice to
>> fix it but IMHO it is not critical for the milestone release."
>>
>>
>> I would vote for merging Till's https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101
>> and then start with the RC0 vote.
>> If there are more bug fixes available and the RC0 vote fails (which is
>> likely ;) ), we can include them as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I can take the role of the release manager and push the 0.10 milestone
>>> release forward.
>>>
>>> I added a list of pending fixes for 0.10 to the wiki:
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
>>> Please extend the list (or respond to this thread) if you have more fixes
>>> that should go into the release.
>>>
>>> From the currently open issues only FLINK-2632 (Web Client does not
>> respect
>>> the class loader of submitted jobs) is unassigned.
>>> Anybody around to pick this one up?
>>>
>>> Cheers, Fabian
>>>
>>> 2015-09-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org>:
>>>
>>>> I forgot to mention that there is also a bug with the `StreamFold`
>>> operator
>>>> which we might consider fixing for the milestone release. I've opened a
>>> PR
>>>> for it.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2631
>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyfora@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This sounds good +1 from me as well :)
>>>>> Till Rohrmann <till.rohrmann@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2015.
>>> szept.
>>>>> 9.,
>>>>> Sze, 10:40):
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release with the TypeInformation issues fixed.
>> I'm
>>>>>> working on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to push one more commit later today.
>>>>>>> A fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632 would
>>>> also
>>>>> be
>>>>>>> highly appreciated by some users.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone volunteering as release manager (for creating release
>>>> candidates
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> uploading them)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <
>>> ktzoumas@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Robert Metzger <
>>>> rmetzger@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 for a "milestone1" release. We have a lot of good
features
>>> in
>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>> that people can benefit from.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Maximilian Michels <
>>>> mxm@apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for releasing a milestone release soon to encourage
>> people
>>>> to
>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>>>> out the new features.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is this bug:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632
>>>>>>>>>> which affects the Web Client's error and results
display
>> for
>>>>> jobs.
>>>>>>>>>> Would be nice to fix it but IMHO it is not critical
for the
>>>>>> milestone
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ufuk Celebi <
>> uce@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08 Sep 2015, at 12:01, Stephan Ewen <
>> sewen@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some day back we talked about releasing an
>>> 0.10.0-milestone1
>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>> master has advanced quite a bit (especially
due to
>>>>>>> high-availability
>>>>>>>>>> code).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I cherry picked the important additions to
the
>>>>>>>>> release-0.10.0-milestone1
>>>>>>>>>>>> branch (fixes and Kafka consumer/producer
rework).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How about releasing the branch now as an
intermediate
>>>> version
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> people to
>>>>>>>>>>>> try out while we stabilize the windows and
HA code for
>> the
>>>>> 0.10
>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for cping the important changes. I’ve
checked and
>>>> there
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> nothing I would add at this point.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can anybody else took a look at it? Other than
that, I
>>> think
>>>>> it’s
>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>> to go.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 


Mime
View raw message