flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [FAILING TEST] StateCheckpoinedITCase
Date Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:31:31 GMT
Pushed a fix for the StateCheckpointedITCase

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for labeling the JIRAs with "test-stability".
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.marton@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Vasia's suggestion
> > On Aug 22, 2015 8:07 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I just came across 2 more :/
> > > I'm also in favor of tracking these with JIRA. How about
> "test-stability"
> > > for a label?
> > >
> > > -V.
> > >
> > > On 21 August 2015 at 12:47, Matthias J. Sax <
> > mjsax@informatik.hu-berlin.de
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I like the idea with the special label. Otherwise, it will be
> difficult
> > > > to find the correct tickets.
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > > On 08/21/2015 12:15 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > > > I'm also in favor of JIRA, because I fear that nobody will keep the
> > > wiki
> > > > > page in sync. Maybe we can assign a special label for test
> stability
> > to
> > > > > these JIRA issues. Then we can quickly find all currently instable
> > test
> > > > > cases.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Robert Metzger <
> > rmetzger@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I agree that we should look for a solution other than opening
a
> lot
> > of
> > > > >> small discussion threads on the mailing list.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> When I have a test failure, I usually search my gmail inbox to
see
> > > > whether
> > > > >> somebody else wrote something about the error already.
> > > > >> Creating a JIRA for each failing test might be a better approach.
> > > > Because
> > > > >> that's what bugtrackers are made for ;) (And the issues still
pop
> up
> > > > when
> > > > >> doing a gmail search)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Matthias J. Sax <
> > > > >> mjsax@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Thanks for the info.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Over the weeks I lost track which errors/failing/instable
tests
> are
> > > > know
> > > > >>> an which not. Should we start a wiki page or similar to collect
> > know
> > > > >>> errors? If a test fails on a know error, it can just be ignored.
> > This
> > > > >>> would avoid "spam" on the mailing list.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Any thoughts about this?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> -Matthias
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 08/20/2015 10:08 PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > > > >>>> Sachin saw the error as well, as reported here:
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2468
> > > > >>>> I also see it from time to time.I have a wip branch where
I
> > relaxed
> > > > the
> > > > >>>> constraints for the test to pass a bit.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Matthias J. Sax <
> > > > >>>> mjsax@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> Error message is:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Failed tests:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> StateCheckpoinedITCase>StreamFaultToleranceTestBase.runCheckpointedProgram:103->postSubmit:98
> > > > >>>>> Test inconclusive: failure occurred before first
checkpoint
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> See: https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/76483093
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> -Matthias
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message