flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Flink 0.9 built with Scala 2.11
Date Fri, 03 Jul 2015 12:26:32 GMT
@Chiwan:

There are a few mentionings of the Scala version in the docs as well. For
example in "docs/index.md" and on the website under "downloads".

We should make sure we explain on these pages that there are downloads for
various Scala versions.

Cheers,
Stephan


On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Alexandrov <
alexander.s.alexandrov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Great, I just posted some comments / improvement suggestions.
>
> I have to say I'm still not 100% convinced by the strategy not to add a
> suffix to all modules. Here is a small example that illustrates my
> concerns.
>
> Consider the following chained dependency situation. We have pure Java
> artifact *flink-pure-java* which depends on a Scala artifact
> *flink-some-scala-A*, which in turn depends on *flink-some-scala-B*.
>
> Let's say the user has directly included *flink-pure-java* and
> *flink-some-scala-B* in the his project and wants to build for Scala 2.11.
> We end up with a situation like this
>
> - flink-pure-java
>   `- flink-some-scala-A
>      `- flink-some-scala-B
> - flink-some-scala-B_2.11
>
> We end up having both versions of *flink-some-scala-B* in our project.
>
>
>
> 2015-07-03 12:24 GMT+02:00 Chiwan Park <chiwanpark@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi All,
> > I created a PR for this issue. [1] Please check and comment about the PR.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chiwan Park
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/885
> >
> > > On Jul 2, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Chiwan Park <chiwanpark@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > @Alexander I’m happy to hear that you want to help me. If you help me,
> I
> > really appreciate. :)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Chiwan Park
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Jul 2, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Alexander Alexandrov <
> > alexander.s.alexandrov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> @Chiwan: let me know if you need hands-on support. I'll be more then
> > happy to help (as my downstream project is using Scala 2.11).
> > >>
> > >> 2015-07-01 17:43 GMT+02:00 Chiwan Park <chiwanpark@apache.org>:
> > >> Okay, I will apply this suggestion.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Chiwan Park
> > >>
> > >>> On Jul 1, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 01 Jul 2015, at 10:34, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1, like that approach
> > >>>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> I like that this is not breaking for non-Scala users :-)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message