Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B03DB18BD0 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24010 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2015 22:23:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 23953 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2015 22:23:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 23940 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2015 22:23:14 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 22:23:14 +0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 299D91A0040 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgv5 with SMTP id 5so89990197wgv.1 for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 15:23:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.7.97 with SMTP id i1mr26980680wja.107.1433715792941; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 15:23:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.48.200 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 15:22:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0CCC37D2-5743-4E50-9DCF-DBAFFE85D936@apache.org> From: Robert Metzger Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 00:22:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Planning the 0.9 Release To: "dev@flink.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d86a58c1a980517f4f857 --047d7b5d86a58c1a980517f4f857 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both marked as blockers. On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still need t= o > be addressed. At least for me, those were > > - fixing errors messages on builds with the JDK8 > - removing Apache thrift dependencies as of > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1635 > - Possibly fix an issue in the delta iterations: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1916 > > @Ufuk: If you're too busy, I could also act as a release manager. > > Cheers, > Max > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > > > > > On 03 Jun 2015, at 17:00, Robert Metzger wrote: > > > > > What is the status of the 0.9 release planning. > > > > > > It seems like many of the open issues from the document have been > closed. > > > When do you think are we able to fork off the "release-0.9" branch an= d > > > create the first RC ? > > > > It would be great to do it in the next days. If there are no objections= , > I > > would like to act as release manager. :-) > > > > Critical issues: > > > > - Skipped buffer ( > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Buffer-re-= ordering-problem-td6009.html > ) > > (I'm on it) > > - Execution graph deadlock (FLINK-2133) > > > > Big open issue: > > - There has been consensus to merge the static code analysis PR for thi= s > > release, which needs some further testing (I'm on it) > > - Batch scheduling. I think Till and Stephan are working on this. Can y= ou > > guys give an estimate whether we will be able to have it in the release= ? > > > > The other big issues have been postponed. > > > > =E2=80=93 Ufuk > --047d7b5d86a58c1a980517f4f857--