flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Planning the 0.9 Release
Date Mon, 08 Jun 2015 07:41:15 GMT
I agree with Marton. I thought Aljoscha was working on that.

On Monday, June 8, 2015, Márton Balassi <balassi.marton@gmail.com> wrote:

> FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persists. Sorry for missing it,
> solving it asap.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both
> marked
> > as
> > > blockers.
> >
> > FLINK-2177 is resolved. Is 2054 ("StreamOperator rework removed copy
> calls
> > when passing output to a chained operator") still a release blocker?
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still
> need
> > to
> > >> be addressed. At least for me, those were
> > >>
> > >> - fixing errors messages on builds with the JDK8
> > >> - removing Apache thrift dependencies as of
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1635
> > >> - Possibly fix an issue in the delta iterations:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1916
> > >>
> > >> @Ufuk: If you're too busy, I could also act as a release manager.
> >
> > Yes, please do so, Max! :) Thanks!
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message