Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5BC9183FD for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37194 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2015 09:56:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 37140 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2015 09:56:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 37128 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2015 09:56:30 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:56:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9AD2A1823E3 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:56:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.88 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qsrobuq15bDG for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 74FA42054C for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so12259615wic.0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 02:55:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=V6boh/Wv6OCI6qTWaCZdCkX5A17Qdg8D4tI4lu5bSxw=; b=yZuhnRwRS7XKULcQl26qO/xN2UDczksg5zJ4wJQLjCRPFfLuIifpkPIzhf6KX4Wz6o SWNEG4nLteQ4eCHC+vyHM1C1iIoaolrZwbC/g1h5/gQtON6zDsneW6udMKDeXTV6HSC7 QN2gWXufhEpAeyXvfAJ//Tpr9bz3j6IaPj2V7R9D3q2dVWtlN2StEuIGLXhYd0kbExfK EHZf64qnI06tlhGGVAz+KNql4knRFqE33HohKc6Pvv/8kbiM1lR4XR0vkU5WKtxyQRLn wEKh77Yhu0qlzuSvIWgKazpCXCekTGC6lcz4tIXIVgbnYyHSy654nfnJEVu/GQojnJDh CEeQ== X-Received: by 10.194.122.168 with SMTP id lt8mr13474171wjb.77.1432893334093; Fri, 29 May 2015 02:55:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.165 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 02:55:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55683206.2070305@informatik.hu-berlin.de> References: <55683206.2070305@informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A1rton_Balassi?= Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 11:55:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bug in flink-connector-kafka ? To: dev@flink.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011777af2e06d10517357a67 --089e011777af2e06d10517357a67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks, good catch. Could you open the JIRA please and assign it to me? Fixing it asap as we would like to cut a release candidate today. :) On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Matthias J. Sax < mjsax@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hi, > > the classes KafkaITCase.java and KafkaLocalSystemTime.java have an wrong > package statement. > > They are in package "org.apache.flink.streaming.kafka" and > "org.apache.flink.streaming.kafka.util" respectily, but the package > statements are > > package org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kafka; > and > > package org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.kafka.util; > > Not sure why the build succeeds. However, I remember a similar issues > that was resolved a few weeks ago > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/437 > > I guess, that breaking up the connector module into sub-modules > introduces this bug. > > Shall I open an JIRA for it or just open a pull request with a fix for > it? Or is anyone else taking care of it? > > > -Matthias > > > > --089e011777af2e06d10517357a67--