Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALuGr6bPja0B3bUpzCm+J+QeFunTPUukaYVKDRFV3-cpiNYySg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <4219027F6234F7418DA53D03FFA0BC6A0172CD85@SUSHDC8002.TD.TERADATA.COM>
 <CAGr9p8BRxMKuoaANszNtKRvDCnPMGspUzPcRVG88JcXksYo7dQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALuGr6aSd=RndsZwYQhPRHp67qKGvgvy+spOpAHcPNnR28jJPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1971CB7D-8D30-43EA-9D83-2DC104299D24@apache.org>
 <CAGco--bb96WzvVOnD44gmQwTfaxqjB_QYhLCbgT=bT+vcdKx1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGr9p8AETA6n-so5AcrvHrwXWcLypBXV2tyroLHXhyp1fsaxkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALuGr6ZNOskuNJ+Viv20PiYpaL1Xeo77bK29AmQ1FnpK4O8whQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGr9p8DTktydiK+ptjw-ZofXPRvL0V=fkeJD4+qrOtJDo3EqaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALuGr6bPja0B3bUpzCm+J+QeFunTPUukaYVKDRFV3-cpiNYySg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:20:47 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGr9p8DeqY2fOKSq-Q8KE2tEO9fc+3X6ypuje2Nj_izVEx3Fsw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Quickstart build - Fat Jar is empty
To: "dev@flink.apache.org" <dev@flink.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04b267f27cb05139f2def

--047d7bb04b267f27cb05139f2def
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I tagged it to affect 0.8.x.
I'll backport the fix to 0.8, then we can mark it as fixed for that release
as well.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ah thanks. I assume this need to be tagged for 0.8.2 release?
>
> On Monday, April 13, 2015, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Its this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1342
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Robert, Which one is the Jira to fix the QuickStart fat jar issue?
> > >
> > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=3Dproject%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%=
20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DE=
SC%2C%20created%20ASC
> > > >
> > > > So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.or=
g
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a
> > 0.8.2
> > > > > release.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue=
.
> We
> > > > could
> > > > > think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, w=
e
> > > could
> > > > > fix
> > > > >
> > > > > "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
> > > > >
> > > > > If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release th=
at
> > > also
> > > > > required some testing..
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.co=
m
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch t=
o
> > fix
> > > > > this,
> > > > > > Robert?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8?
> As
> > > you
> > > > > > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than
> > empty.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > > > > > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the syst=
em
> > and
> > > > > > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > > > > > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC
> would
> > > not
> > > > > > need a lot of testing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release=
,
> > but
> > > > > since
> > > > > > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking
> to
> > > > 0.8. I
> > > > > > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as th=
e
> > > > primary
> > > > > > download.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > =E2=80=93 Ufuk
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--047d7bb04b267f27cb05139f2def--