flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Quickstart build - Fat Jar is empty
Date Mon, 13 Apr 2015 04:52:41 GMT
Robert, Which one is the Jira to fix the QuickStart fat jar issue?

On Friday, April 10, 2015, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:

> We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>
> So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release.
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a 0.8.2
> > release.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue. We
> could
> > think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, we could
> > fix
> >
> > "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
> >
> > If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release that also
> > required some testing..
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix
> > this,
> > > Robert?
> > >
> > > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As you
> > > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than empty.
> > >
> > > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> > >
> > > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system and
> > > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would not
> > > need a lot of testing
> > >
> > > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release, but
> > since
> > > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to
> 0.8. I
> > > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the
> primary
> > > download.
> > >
> > > – Ufuk
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message