Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20F2C17952 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49324 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2015 18:39:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 49261 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2015 18:39:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 49249 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2015 18:39:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:39:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of henry.saputra@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.170] (HELO mail-lb0-f170.google.com) (209.85.217.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:39:05 +0000 Received: by lbbsy1 with SMTP id sy1so36398102lbb.1 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:37:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Guxb4SDVNeeUoa/qHtFMXHqa/8cms8yo+9ST35POy/c=; b=Q62lfgwgAtU+RkIdSJEYE/Zgj7YbkcRNgenPWixri/a23WZhWImXDn/RcetcRvRPP3 eZsC+YmvSfZPb9wfFYJ7oDN7T703ty5EmO4nX9HBtukouxVg1Q68h6z5Cc7EGJR3jDeV nFpwdl9wf4/kVkBq7Fq0551O1EEiOripWS2AVyo5B5POxiFAcqGIZJmMU370tBGAyFpD Pv5fUgIIOccnV8o5BCJe7VTaH4nThrUy/iuKDHpPo40mCSFvVVvleCHVYs6NOWAr6uVM bj3783X3UL6kpih8alSC1juNFckpwJWvs0ZMffH2ESXk+C5UuyrdhIRwF3huO9mw1QqM TaPQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.198.1 with SMTP id iy1mr66270866lbc.13.1426703834345; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.143.77 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:37:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] Submitting small PRs rather than massive ones From: Henry Saputra To: "dev@flink.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi All, Recently there have been some PRs with massive changes which include multiple JIRA tickets. It is getting tougher to review and also to back port changes if needed. To help reviewers to help review the changes lets try to submit small but often PRs to make it easier to review. Not to mention Github UI suffers with diff changes over 200 files and thousands lines of code changes =) When committing to ASF git it should be fine to combine one day of work but PRs should as isolated as possible. Exception such as new module like Gelly or ML maybe ok, but others that require changes to the execution flow should be done if smaller batches if possible. Thanks, Henry