flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
Date Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:51:59 GMT
Nice, I see the rename is already merged!

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com> wrote:

> Cool, looking forward to use this great feature! :-)
> On Mar 29, 2015 12:26 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" <aljoscha@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
> >
> > We have 15 votes:
> >   +Relation: 4
> >   +DataTable: 3
> >   +Table: 8
> >
> > So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
> > pull request with the rename and Java support.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <hongsibao@huawei.com>
> > wrote:
> > > +Table
> > >
> > > 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.]
> > [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
> > > 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
> > > 收件人: Hongsibao
> > > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > >
> > > +Table
> > >
> > > 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
> > >
> > >> +Table
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Thanks Henry. :D
> > >> >
> > >> > +Relation
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > +Table
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> +DataTable
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr.
<
> > >> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>>
> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > +Table
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-)
)
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
> > >> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> > >> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
> > >> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > +Table API
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the
economy
> > than
> > >> > >> > Relation.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > >> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly
used by
> people
> > >> with
> > >> > a
> > >> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while
table is
> > more
> > >> the
> > >> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice)
Am
> > >> 25.03.2015
> > >> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> > >> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most
votes, a new
> > vote
> > >> > with
> > >> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner
cases as
> they
> > >> > appear.
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> ---
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for
the name of the
> > project,
> > >> we
> > >> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference
ordering.
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable,
but what happens
> > if I
> > >> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie
between DataTable
> and
> > >> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable
then?
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >> > >> > >>> <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
> > >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> > >> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra"
<
> > >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
> > >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>> PS
> > >> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast
your own vote :)
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha
Krettek
> > >> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name
of the equivalent to DataSet
> > and
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based
API.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>  From the previous discussion
thread three names
> emerged:
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next
72 hours.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes
is chosen.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name
having the most votes, a
> new
> > >> vote
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting
scheme will be done.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion
> > below:
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
> > > To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List
> > archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<mailto:
> > ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com>
> > > To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.,
> > click here<
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4
> > >.
> > > NAML<
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
> > > Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing
> > list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message