flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Make a release to be announced at ApacheCon
Date Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:02:26 GMT
Yeah, always prefer to get it with consensus that VOTE

I am fine with either.

- Henry

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzoumas@apache.org> wrote:
> The ASF press team wants to announce next week, so a 3-day vote right now
> might cancel the subject line of this thread :-)
>
> Perhaps we can reach consensus in the DISCUSS thread or have a 24-hour vote?
>
> I agree with Stephan on 0.9.0.M1 (or 0.9.0-m1 or whatever), as it seems
> that other open source projects are using this naming scheme.
>
> Kostas
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I think "Milestone" pretty much says that we have some crucial things in
>> there, but not all. "Beta" in comparison, has an "immature early version"
>> connotation.
>>
>> We are, for example, using a milestone 1 version of Jetty for the Web
>> Frontend, so that is a pretty standard thing, in my opinion:
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId>
>> <artifactId>jetty-server</artifactId>
>> <version>8.0.0.M1</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Looks like we need to vote on 0.9-beta or 0.9-milestone.
>> >
>> > Can we find consensus whether to add a 1 after the name? -beta1 or
>> > -milestone1.
>> > Adding a 1 allows us to create a second beta/milestone release.
>> >
>> > I'm against adding a 1.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > On 26 Mar 2015, at 11:01, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Two weeks have passed since we've discussed the 0.9 release the last
>> > > time.
>> > > >
>> > > > The ApacheCon is in 18 days from now.
>> > > > If we want, we can also release a "0.9.0-beta" release that contains
>> > > known
>> > > > bugs, but allows our users to try out the new features easily
>> (because
>> > > they
>> > > > are part of a release). The vote for such a release would be mainly
>> > about
>> > > > the legal aspects of the release rather than the stability. So I
>> > suspect
>> > > > that the vote will go through much quicker.
>> > >
>> > > +1 for 0.9-beta
>> > >
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message